Are you
the same and in unity with YOUR father?
OR...
Are you
different and separate from him?
Are you not two distinct persons having one human essence...
Maybe it's a father-son thing...
I think I see PPS' point here, perhaps. You 'express' tri-theism at times.
God is more than just a familial name, it is indeed personal and modal in conveyance. The problem with modalism is that it doesn't account for Son and Father, but it must also be understood that we do, in fact, embrace modal language to the extent that God is One with no division. Part of the problem, I believe, comes from Christ becoming flesh. It makes a separation in our minds that is very hard to account for. Modalists simply believe God became Flesh as that one being and that prayer between Father and Son was but illustration/modeling/pattern for our benefit.
Such is wrong, but 'half' wrong. They are accurately describing one-ness that is -une (of tri- -une) or '-arian' to the degree they understand half of the revelation of God's conveyance of Himself to us.
Back whar I grow'd up, yer wasn't a reel man till'n yer could whup y'er ol' man 'stead o' vise-verser ...
That makes sense then. I had no idea where this came from when I first saw it and thought it was incredibly weird. When my step-father came to me, as his dad had done to him, I simply said "If you want to beat the tar out of me, go ahead. I love you to much and respect you too much to ever strike you back."
With God it is different...
For we are fallen, you see...
And God is guiding us back to Him...
And the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three Person's without boundaries of Essence... The inter-penetration of Persons is the mark of God's Love... Without it, we are isolated from one another... Floating monads of separation... Conjugal union is but a Typos of the REAL union of Person we find with Christ, which itself is a Typos of the Union of Christ with the Father and the Holy Spirit... All in differentiation of Person without essential separation...
But wounded and fallen as we are, we start out with baby steps...
ME a baby!
Arsenios
The danger of analogy is to forget other scriptures such as:
Numbers 23:19 God is not a man....
Isaiah 55:18&19 My ways are not your ways, My thoughts are not your thoughts...
Ephesians 3:17 so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith—that you, being rooted and grounded in love,
Ephesians 3:18 may have strength to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, Eph 3:19 and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.
Ephesians 3:20 Now to him who is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think, according to the power at work within us,
Ephesians 3:21 to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, forever and ever. Amen.
For me, the triune view seeks to embrace ALL scripture and then go no further. We can give analogy for what we understand, but should correct one another when it steps into waters that deny scriptures.
For me, the Gospel of John greatly influences and expresses my triune understanding. It makes certain God's oneness and threeness. If any man can embrace John 1:1 as it sits, with "both/and," I believe they will always be triune without overtly emphasizing one over the other.