Nuking Mecca - Reasonable Course Of Action Or Bat Crazy Far Right...

[Arthur Brain]

Not much on history are you ? Emperor worship in Japan was destroyed and changed. In Germany worshiping the fatherland was changed.

The world will NEVER change the barbaric beliefs of Islam until they stomp them and their death cult into oblivion.

The crusades were a result of Muslims trying to force their death cult on the west and the lesson learned seems to have been forgotten.

It was not "destroyed", in fact, fundamentally it didn't change very much. The emperor was not regarded as a god in any literal sense or only by a few and even then he wasn't regarded as an omnipotent being or some such:

"The ties between Us and Our people have always stood on mutual trust and affection. They do not depend upon mere legends and myths.
They are not predicated on the false conception that the Emperor is divine, and that the Japanese people are superior to other races and fated to rule the world."
from the Imperial rescript, January 1, 1946

Japanese culture and custom wasn't destroyed and nor will Islam be by some whacko gung ho mentality where deranged nutcases think they can nuke it out of existence.

You are bonkers if you think you can, flat out.

:hammer:

 

[Arthur Brain]

Imagine his feigned outrage if I'd used the term "nips" :chuckle:




He's a dimwitted moron who destroyed what little cognitive ability he may once have had with alcoholism

Pity him

Pity yourself dude. Look at yourself, a guy who comes onto forums to troll, stalk, obsess, spread lies and gossip. If there's anyone with a drink problem around these parts it's you so stop projecting your own habits onto me thanks. Maybe if you get your own drinking in order you won't get banned so routinely and will have the cognitive ability to manage to operate within forum rules.

Otherwise, being called dimwitted by a feeble troll who's vocab pretty much begins and ends with 'retard' is a compliment.

 

[dodge]

It was not "destroyed", in fact, fundamentally it didn't change very much. The emperor was not regarded as a god in any literal sense or only by a few and even then he wasn't regarded as an omnipotent being or some such:

"The ties between Us and Our people have always stood on mutual trust and affection. They do not depend upon mere legends and myths.
They are not predicated on the false conception that the Emperor is divine, and that the Japanese people are superior to other races and fated to rule the world."
from the Imperial rescript, January 1, 1946

Japanese culture and custom wasn't destroyed and nor will Islam be by some whacko gung ho mentality where deranged nutcases think they can nuke it out of existence.

You are bonkers if you think you can, flat out.

:hammer:

Un-like snow flakes people with common sense see the problem of placating a death cult named Islam instead of destroying it.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Un-like snow flakes people with common sense see the problem of placating a death cult named Islam instead of destroying it.

The only way you could destroy Islam is by destroying everything else. Thank the stars that fruitcakes like you don't have access to launch codes...

:freak:

 

[ok doser]

Maybe when artie comes back he can take a crack at this:

Propose a scenario in which a US nuke strike against Mecca would "plunge the world into catastrophe"


In particular, describe the possible sequence of events which would lead to a Russian retaliatory strike and the reasoning behind such an action by Russia

 

[Nick M]

 

[Arthur Brain]

Maybe when artie comes back he can take a crack at this:

If America were to launch a first strike, even a low yield battlefield nuke on Mecca then what do you suppose is going to be the reaction of the rest of the world? America has committed its own act of terror - more so, if like Tam, you wouldn't even give a warning so citizens could evacuate beforehand. It may not lead to immediate nuclear war and you seem focussed on Russia as being the only 'player' in this for some reason. They aren't, although along with every country in NATO, they'd at least publicly condemn it as reckless warmongering. To deny the serious and potentially disastrous ramifications of such lunacy is almost as daft as claiming blowing up Mecca would destroy Islam in the first place. Congratulations, you've at the very least invited all manner of reprisals to your own country.

 

[Greg Jennings]

If America were to launch a first strike, even a low yield battlefield nuke on Mecca then what do you suppose is going to be the reaction of the rest of the world? America has committed its own act of terror - more so, if like Tam, you wouldn't even give a warning so citizens could evacuate beforehand. It may not lead to immediate nuclear war and you seem focussed on Russia as being the only 'player' in this for some reason. They aren't, although along with every country in NATO, they'd at least publicly condemn it as reckless warmongering. To deny the serious and potentially disastrous ramifications of such lunacy is almost as daft as claiming blowing up Mecca would destroy Islam in the first place. Congratulations, you've at the very least invited all manner of reprisals to your own country.

China and Russia would jump at the opportunity to paint us (in this case rightfully) as the villain of the world. Pakistan, Jordan, and all of our other Muslim allies are gone. They will turn from the west to the east for good.

The UN would likely levy severe economic sanctions on the US for the worst human rights violation of all-time, perhaps cutting us off altogether for a number of years. And where oh where do we get our precious oil from then?

You hardliners haven't thought this through much, have you?

 

[Arthur Brain]

China and Russia would jump at the opportunity to paint us (in this case rightfully) as the villain of the world. Pakistan, Jordan, and all of our other Muslim allies are gone. They will turn from the west to the east for good.

The UN would likely levy severe economic sanctions on the US for the worst human rights violation of all-time, perhaps cutting us off altogether for a number of years. And where oh where do we get our precious oil from then?

You hardliners haven't thought this through much, have you?

They haven't thought it through at all. Easier to sit in an armchair and talk about nuking places than it is to think through the obvious consequences. Some of these nuts probably think the US is impervious...

 

[ok doser]

And where oh where do we get our precious oil from then?

Same place we do now

Primarily internal production supplemented by our two largest suppliers, mexico and canada


And if you think the UN is gonna be able to stop countries from providing us with oil and deny themselves the income, you're delusional :chuckle:


And as far as "economic sanctions", we're 25% of the world economy

You think the UN is going to tamper with that? :darwinsm:

 

[ok doser]

If America were to launch a first strike, even a low yield battlefield nuke on Mecca then what do you suppose is going to be the reaction of the rest of the world?

"Plunge the world into catastrophe?" :idunno:

America has committed its own act of terror - more so, if like Tam, you wouldn't even give a warning so citizens could evacuate beforehand.

I'm not tam

It may not lead to immediate nuclear war ...

Good, 'cause that would prolly "plunge the world into catastrophe"

and you seem focussed on Russia as being the only 'player' in this for some reason.

They're the only country with a nuclear stockpile anything close to ours, 7000 to our 6800

Next up is france with 300

If you think a country with 300 nukes is gonna threaten a country with 6800, you're more brain-damaged than everybody thinks you are

They aren't

Supra

, although along with every country in NATO, they'd at least publicly condemn it as reckless warmongering.

So now "plunge the world into catastrophe" becomes "public condemnation"? :chuckle:

To deny the serious and potentially disastrous ramifications ...

I'm willing to risk the "serious and potentially disastrous ramifications" of public condemnation :chuckle:

Congratulations, you've at the very least invited all manner of reprisals to your own country.

Starting with public condemnation that will "plunge the world into catastrophe" :darwinsm:

 

[Greg Jennings]

Same place we do now

Primarily internal production supplemented by our two largest suppliers, mexico and canada

Fair enough, but that still means we don't get our Middle East oil. Where do we make up the deficit? Are you good with massively expensive gasoline?

And if you think the UN is gonna be able to stop countries from providing us with oil and deny themselves the income, you're delusional :chuckle:

If you think the UN is going to sit by and kindly continue to deal with a country that just nuked a close ally without warning, then you are the delusional one buddy

And as far as "economic sanctions", we're 25% of the world economy

You think the UN is going to tamper with that? :darwinsm:

Yes! They will make exceptions IF WE NUKE AN ALLY. You can't trust a country that does stupid things like that! If we nuked Mecca, why not Berlin? Why not Paris? Why not Beijing or Istanbul?

For example, they would reduce sanctions (or eliminate them) on Russia, which has the most oil in the entire world if I'm not mistaken. They will find what they need somewhere else.

And our economy is so great because we have good trading partners. We won't if we NUKE AN ALLY

 

[ok doser]

If you think the UN is going to sit by and kindly continue to deal with a country ....

So they're gonna give back the $8 billion dollars we give 'em each year?

 

[musterion]

Fair enough, but that still means we don't get our Middle East oil. Where do we make up the deficit? Are you good with massively expensive gasoline?

We don't need gas, we can all ride the bus!

Solar!

Wind!

Dilithium!

Hydroelectric!

Let's rape willing Mother Nature of her limitless, renewable natural bounty instead of relying on evil, man-made oil.

If you think the UN is going to sit by and kindly continue to deal with a country that just nuked a close ally without warning, then you are the delusional one buddy

The U.N. is a bunch of corrupt, impotent, bisexual yogurt-eating surrender monkeys whose "troops" are too busy raping local populations to fight. Gun owners in the U.S. will take care of them blue helmets.

Yes! They will make exceptions IF WE NUKE AN ALLY. You can't trust a country that does stupid things like that!

They will do what Trump tells them to do! And so will you!

For example, they would reduce sanctions (or eliminate them) on Russia, which has the most oil in the entire world if I'm not mistaken. They will find what they need somewhere else.

We have enough oil reserves of our own. All we need do is tap them and bulldoze all the pipeline-protesting hippie neanderthals out of the way.

And our economy is so great because we have good trading partners. We won't if we NUKE AN ALLY

USA! USA! USA!

 

[Arthur Brain]

"Plunge the world into catastrophe?" :idunno:



I'm not tam



Good, 'cause that would prolly "plunge the world into catastrophe"



They're the only country with a nuclear stockpile anything close to ours, 7000 to our 6800

Next up is france with 300

If you think a country with 300 nukes is gonna threaten a country with 6800, you're more brain-damaged than everybody thinks you are





Supra



So now "plunge the world into catastrophe" becomes "public condemnation"? :chuckle:




I'm willing to risk the "serious and potentially disastrous ramifications" of public condemnation :chuckle:




Starting with public condemnation that will "plunge the world into catastrophe" :darwinsm:

In WWII the only country with operative nukes was America and the comparatively low yield of those compared with today makes numbers completely moot. There's enough to blow this planet apart numerous times over. The destructive potential of just a single high yield warhead in a populated area is awful beyond words. Not that I expect you to watch this but for anyone interested:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GJttnC8PoA

And this is going back to the early 80's...

You, sir, are a dipstick.

Good day to you.

:e4e:

 

[Arthur Brain]

We don't need gas, we can all ride the bus!

Solar!

Wind!

Dilithium!

Hydroelectric!

Let's rape willing Mother Nature of her limitless, renewable natural bounty instead of relying on evil, man-made oil.



The U.N. is a bunch of corrupt, impotent, bisexual yogurt-eating surrender monkeys whose "troops" are too busy raping local populations to fight. Gun owners in the U.S. will take care of them blue helmets.



They will do what Trump tells them to do! And so will you!



We have enough oil reserves of our own. All we need do is tap them and bulldoze all the pipeline-protesting hippie neanderthals out of the way.



USA! USA! USA!

And unfortunately this isn't a parody or satirical...

:freak:

 

[Angel4Truth]

So they're gonna give back the $8 billion dollars we give 'em each year?

I wonder why he thinks we answer to the UN.

 

[ok doser]

In WWII the only country with operative nukes was America and the comparatively low yield of those compared with today makes numbers completely moot. There's enough to blow this planet apart numerous times over. The destructive potential of just a single high yield warhead in a populated area is awful beyond words.

Propose a rational scenario in which any country in the world which has nukes would respond to a US strike against Mecca by launching against America

 

[Tambora]

if like Tam, you wouldn't even give a warning so citizens could evacuate beforehand.

You must suck at chess.

 

[Tambora]

Propose a rational scenario in which any country in the world which has nukes would respond to a US strike against Mecca by launching against America

I'm thinking a lot of them would be clapping their hands.