If you support or are sympathetic to a nuke attack on anywhere then that's what you're supporting.
Are you claiming there is no such thing as *selective nuking*? :think:
If you support or are sympathetic to a nuke attack on anywhere then that's what you're supporting.
AGAIN: SEE THE FIRST POST ON THIS PAGE
I'm starting to question if you can read
Are you claiming there is no such thing as *selective nuking*? :think:
In WWII the only country with operative nukes was America and the comparatively low yield of those compared with today makes numbers completely moot. There's enough to blow this planet apart numerous times over. The destructive potential of just a single high yield warhead in a populated area is awful beyond words.
China can cover that, and Russia sans economic sanctions could chip in mightily also.
Despite what you guys might think, the US is not greater than every other country combined.
Propose a rational scenario in which any country with a nuclear arsenal would respond to a US strike against Mecca with a launch against America
On making up an $8 billion dollar a year shortfall in the UN budget:China can cover that, and Russia sans economic sanctions could chip in mightily also.{/quote]
:darwinsm:
Good one! :thumb:
What makes you think "every other country combined" would be against us?
Oh, um, hmm...
Because you've just committed an extreme act of barbarism and terror that runs contrary to NATO and peaceful alliance?
Yeah, the USA would just be given a huge pat on the back dude!
:thumb:
Glad to see you've sobered up :thumb:
doser said:Glad to see you've sobered up :thumb:
Seems you need your eyesight checked as well then...
Because you've just committed an extreme act of barbarism and terror that runs contrary to NATO and peaceful alliance?
Yeah, the USA would just be given a huge pat on the back dude!
:thumb:
Ok, so you and Greg think that "every other country combined" would be "against us"
What does that mean?
They'd sacrifice their GDPs by no longer trading with us?
They'd go to war against us?
They'd make strong statements against us in the un?
Ok, have it your way :idunno:
Clearly you know little about China's economic power and reach. How shocking.On making up an $8 billion dollar a year shortfall in the UN budget:
:darwinsm:
Good one! :thumb:
That was just a hypothetical. It seems like many people here honestly believe that the good ol' US of A can take on and beat anything and everything that could ever be thrown at it, and obviously that isn't the case. We DEPEND on imports just like anyone elseWhat makes you think "every other country combined" would be against us?
Clearly you know little about China's economic power and reach. How shocking.
Funny side note: the Darwinism emoji-thing is misspelled. Watch
darwinism: :darwinism:
Darwinsm: :darwinsm:
I guess proper spelling is something else young Earthers don't believe in
That was just a hypothetical. It seems like many people here honestly believe that the good ol' US of A can take on and beat anything and everything that could ever be thrown at it, and obviously that isn't the case. We DEPEND on imports just like anyone else
America can withstand anythingYou heretic. How dare you impugn America's ability to withstand the inevitable onslaught after first strike?!
:nono:
America is 95% country
Every country is predominantly rural.
You're the idiot
America is 95% country
Bat **** crazy Far Right lain:
Having a bit of dejavu
Lol
The second kargest religion in the world- nothing more really meeds to be said, it speaks for itself