6days
New member
How many species of bacteria are there? Does it matter if you don't know the exact number?How many "bird kinds" are there?
How many species of bacteria are there? Does it matter if you don't know the exact number?How many "bird kinds" are there?
Now that's funny!I am the arbiter of who can't answer a simple question! :darwinsm:
To discuss science, people need to respect two things: The idea presented, and the laws of physics.
Darwinists have no time for either.
How many species of bacteria are there? Does it matter if you don't know the exact number?
You tell us. :idunno:And the problem with understanding the laws of physics is??
Plenty of people.No, of course not. But literal Genesis believers make a big deal of "kinds". So they should be interested it determining how many kinds there were only a few thousand years ago, and going from that to the biodiversity we see today.
Who is doing research in that area? If you know.
Genesis believers make a big deal of "kinds". So they should be interested it determining how many kinds there were only a few thousand years ago, and going from that to the biodiversity we see today.
Who is doing research in that area? If you know.
Plenty of people.
. | |
You tell us. :idunnolenty of people.
:rotfl:See post #180. Stripe brought up the issue of physics. But he appears unable to explain further.
1. The answer is in the text. The number is not relevant.
2. Not relevant.
3. Not relevant.
And by not relevant, I am referring to your attempt to discredit the Holy words of God in the Bible.
Tough questions that make you think and dissect your own ideology.
No, you were asked specifically about the issue of physics which you brought up. Despite the fact that you brought physics into the discussion you are either unwilling or unable to further explain. Standard Stripe.:darwinsm:
Where is the challenge?
So far, we've only been asked about kinds and their numbers. The answers have been supplied, but all Losername does is ask another pointless question.
Darwinists hate reading.No, you were asked specifically about the issue of physics which you brought up. Despite the fact that you brought physics into the discussion you are either unwilling or unable to further explain. Standard Stripe.
But literal fish to philosopher believers make a big deal of "species". So they should be interested it determining how many species there were a few million years ago, and going from that to the biodiversity we see today.Jonahdog said:But literal Genesis believers make a big deal of "kinds". So they should be interested it determining how many kinds there were only a few thousand years ago, and going from that to the biodiversity we see today.
Who is doing research in that area? If you know.
But literal fish to philosopher believers make a big deal of "species". So they should be interested it determining how many species there were a few million years ago, and going from that to the biodiversity we see today.
Who is doing research in that area? If you know.... lots of people?
:rotfl:
Darwinists hate reading.
Charles Darwin was good at observation...you are too!Oh my, back to not answering questions, I see. And doing so in the 5th grade manner.
Charles Darwin was good at observation...you are too!
You know nothing of what it means to be a Christian.As a good Christian.
See?To convert someone.
ACTUALLY... Darwin was good at observing but lousy at making sound conclusions. Would you like examples?Darwin was also good at making sense of what he observed. You are not.