Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Is anyone who isn't insane enough to advocate nuking the Middle East "supporting Islam" you epic tool?
Muslims burn 43 more to death....because the 40 last week wasn't enough
- Thread starter Nick M
- Start date
Is anyone who isn't insane enough to advocate nuking the Middle East "supporting Islam" you epic tool?
shagster01
New member
In other words, nuke the babies or support Islam. Those are our options according to Nick M.
shagster01
New member
In another thread you said right and wrong is absolute.
So is killing babies (via nuke or any other way) absolutely wrong? Or have you had a change of heart?
lain: No, though you support intentionally misrepresenting my views, as well as the views of anyone who calls you out after making such ignorant, outlandish claims/statements.When someone tells me they wish to stop Islam by nuking a good portion of the population, I see a veiled attempt to hide their true motive.
You could have just as easily stated "I wish to eradicate those extremist who claim the label of Islam". There is a fairly obvious reason you didn't.
I can say that your reality is either skewed OR you are one of the most dishonest people I have ever interacted with on the internet.
You make sweeping generalization for a reason. Without them, you cannot make your case.
Here, let me help you. Should all murderers be executed?
Yes.
Are all Muslims murderers (including the infant in his crib and his toddling sister)?
No.
By YOUR logic, the answer would be yes.
My logic is to give the HONEST answer. No. They are not.
This is life, not the Wild West. I will never ever support blind, mass killings (nuking) when we know that the casualties will include INNOCENTS.
Sorry your huffing and puffing didn't take those children into consideration prior to your brilliant declaration.
:idunno: I support the right to practice one's own religion EXCEPT when that religion is translated into violence towards others.
Being that people are born with a conscience, it would stand to reason that some individuals might doubt or flat out reject the beliefs of their parents.
shagster01
New member
It means you disagree with Nick.
Tinark
Active member
Some of them can probably be rehabilitated (although it's hard to determine which ones). A close example is Maajid Nawaz who was part of an extremist Islamist organization for 13 years, who joined as a teenager, and was involved in recruiting army officers from various countries to plot coups to overthrow governments.
After being in prison in Egypt for 5 years, he had a realization that Islamism was wrong and now is one the strongest voice against it and the strongest advocate for Western liberal values within the Muslim community.
I'm not saying to avoid targeting them in the battle field - but if ISIS eventually collapses, that doesn't mean that they are all the enemy. We didn't slaughter all the boys that were part of Hitler Youth after WWII. We prosecuted the butchers and the torturers and forgave those who were substantially under the influence of Nazi officers.
Thanks for the links Abdul. It does my heart good to know that there are Christians out there that don't turn the other cheek while other Christians are being slaughtered by child molesting barbarians.
Yee haw!
Tinark
Active member
It means not supporting slaughtering every last person who believes in Islam, and their children, apparently, even if it means killing Christians and Jews in the process (nukes are indiscriminate), so long as none of the Muslims survive.
Sounds pretty indistinguishable from ISIS' strategy (except they don't have nukes).
Tinark
Active member
No, we haven't, but we are analyzing Nick's violent fantasies and Orwellian use of language. He seems to also have an ally in aCW
shagster01
New member
Christians not turning the other cheek. Just as Jesus instructed.
These people have more in common than they want to acknowledge or think.
Since when were pagans authorized to speak for God?
shagster01
New member
Are you calling Jesus a pagan, because I quoted him?
Tinark
Active member
Since when were they not?
Only someone high on drugs would think that.
Take a hit off your bong and show us in the Bible where Jesus Christ/the Son of God/God in the flesh doesn't allow self defense as a means of staying alive, because that's what these Christians are doing.
When they pervert Scripture to meet their own selfish desires.
Tinark
Active member
Who determines what is and isn't a perversion of scripture? You? Are you authorized to determine that?