MUSK BUYS TWITTER!

way 2 go

Well-known member


2. Kevin Michelena - current Twitter Sr. Corporate Security Analyst. Ex FBI Intelligence Analyst 12 years
3. Doug Hunt - current Twitter Senior Director. Ex FBI Special Agent 20 years.
4. Mark Jaroszewski - current Twitter Director Corporate Security/Risk. Ex FBI 20 years
5. Douglas Turner - current Twitter Senior Manager, Corporate and Executive Security Services. Ex FBI 14 years. Ex Secret Service 7 years.
6. Patrick G. - current Twitter Head of Corporate Security. Ex FBI Special Agent 23 years

7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member

Laura Loomer Returns To Twitter!

The most banned woman in the world is now back on Twitter! Laura Loomer, the investigative journalist and candidate who exposed Kevin McCarthy’s plan to subvert the America First movement, has been unbanished from Twitter.
Would have been marginally more impressive if she held out for more than two hours voluntary handcuffing at Twitter HQ before requesting the police cut through them...

Otherwise, wow, what a nut and hey, let her make more of a clown of herself...

 

way 2 go

Well-known member
237637_mtuyj9ttfbxu1ah_full.jpeg
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Hmm, the far "religious" right endorse such things as the following on here:

The DP for homosexuals, practicing at least.
The DP for those caught in adultery.
The DP for children as young as five cos they can be held as accountable as an adult for stuff apparently.
Enforced marriage for anyone having sex outside of marriage with no possibility of divorce etc etc...

What a crock.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
The DP for homosexuals, practicing at least.

Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:18-32

The DP for those caught in adultery.

Deuteronomy 22:23-24; Luke 18:19-20; James 2:11

The DP for children as young as five cos they can be held as accountable as an adult for stuff apparently.

Deuteronomy 19:11-13, 15-21

Enforced marriage for anyone having sex outside of marriage with no possibility of divorce etc etc...

Deuteronomy 22:28-29

Hmm, the far "religious" right endorse such things as the following on here:

. . .

What a crock.

Yep, you're quite the crock, indeed, trying to belittle those who are on God's side for being on God's side.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:18-32



Deuteronomy 22:23-24; Luke 18:19-20; James 2:11



Deuteronomy 19:11-13, 15-21



Deuteronomy 22:28-29



Yep, you're quite the crock, indeed, trying to belittle those who are on God's side for being on God's side.
Ah! Well, this was unexpected. A bunch of verses to support legalism in the modern day age. Man, I bet you wish you were born centuries ago...

Well, you're not and you're just a modern day embodiment of the legalists of the time. Well, to be fair, you're actually worse as there's no support for your risible nonsense about executing five year old children and holding them as accountable for their actions as adults. There never has been. Your posit from the get go on that has been sick as all get out, downright twisted, vile and putrid as well as being unsupportable. You are one sick puppy and then some...

Bring your little ban hammer down JR, this place is a festering joke nowadays anyway.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
A bunch of verses

As opposed to the whinings of Arthur Brain...

Bet you didn't even bother to look the verses I posted up.

to support legalism in the modern day age.

If it were legalism, Arthur, then I would be promoting every law in every book under the sun.

But I don't. I promote five laws, on which the foundations of society rest upon, and from whence all other just laws are derived from.

you're just a modern day embodiment of the legalists of the time.

False.

Well, to be fair, you're actually worse

False.

as there's no support for your risible nonsense about executing five year old children and holding them as accountable for their actions as adults.

Looks like I was right. You didn't even bother to read the verses I referenced.

But please, make a counter-argument. Show, from scripture, where it supports your position. Prove me wrong.

You can't, because 1) you won't even try, and 2) even if you did, you wouldn't be able to, because the Bible doesn't support the idea that children be punished for crime differently than adults.

Why? Because that idea came long after the Bible was written, because ACTUAL legalists needed to put into law-books what should have never needed to be, because society slowly stopped teaching basic morality to the next generation. Look where that's gotten us today. Homos and pedophiles roam the streets unafraid, murderers run rampant, children are taught by strangers while their parents work, all while those who stand against such things are pushed further and further from the public square.

The Bible was written in a way that expects the one reading it to be on the same page (pardon the pun) as the one writing it. Meaning that the authors expected people to be aware that many laws are simply unnecessary when the basics, the fundamentals, if you will, are firmly ingrained in one's mind. In other words, you don't need laws specifically telling people not to take money from the cash register, because "you shall not steal" covers all forms of theft.

There never has been.

I just gave you what you keep denying exists. The saying holds true: you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink it.

Your posit from the get go on that has been sick as all get out, downright twisted, vile and putrid as well as being unsupportable.

Throwing a tantrum and using fallacies won't make your beliefs any less false.

You are one sick puppy and then some...

Ad hominem, and disrespect of a moderator has earned you a warning and temporary ban.

Bring your little ban hammer down JR, this place is a festering joke nowadays anyway.

Then why are you still here?

Misery loves company, is my guess.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Deuteronomy 19:11-13, 15-21

By the way, this passage specifically says "anyone," and reinforces it with "your eye shall not pity."

“But if anyone hates his neighbor, lies in wait for him, rises against him and strikes him mortally, so that he dies, and he flees to one of these cities,then the elders of his city shall send and bring him from there, and deliver him over to the hand of the avenger of blood, that he may die.Your eye shall not pity him, but you shall put away the guilt of innocent blood from Israel, that it may go well with you.“ . . . One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.If a false witness rises against any man to testify against him of wrongdoing,then both men in the controversy shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the judges who serve in those days.And the judges shall make careful inquiry, and indeed, if the witness is a false witness, who has testified falsely against his brother,then you shall do to him as he thought to have done to his brother; so you shall put away the evil from among you.And those who remain shall hear and fear, and hereafter they shall not again commit such evil among you.Your eye shall not pity: life shall be for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. - Deuteronomy 19:11-13,15-21 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy19:11-13,15-21&version=NKJV
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Why wouldn't you be a McCarthy fan? Are you not aware that Trump has endorsed McCarthy to be the speaker of the House?
Bizzaro World. The Dems oppose the RINO that Trump supports. Absolute Bizzaro World.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Bizzaro World. The Dems oppose the RINO that Trump supports. Absolute Bizzaro World.
Why would Trump do such a thing as endorse McCarthy to be the speaker of the House? Are you waking up to the fact that Trump is as bananas as a barrel full of wet monkeys, or will it still take you some more time to figure that out?
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Why would Trump do such a thing as endorse McCarthy to be the speaker of the House? Are you waking up to the fact that Trump is as bananas as a barrel full of wet monkeys, or will it still take you some more time to figure that out?
Why would the Dems do such a thing as oppose such a total RINO like McCarthy to be speaker of the House? Are you waking up to the fact that the Dems are as bananas as a barrel full of wet monkeys, or will it still take you some more time to figure that out?

I can only surmise that McCarthy has either always been a sleeper (hard to believe) and the Dems have just recently learned this, or McCarthy has recently been blackmailed and both the Dems and Trump are aware of it.
 
Top