Ever watch one of those chuckleheads run for a bus? :chuckle:
Ever watch one of those chuckleheads run for a bus? :chuckle:
I thought prison culture and black culture were the same thing. :idunno:
Now, I see why you have the reputation you do. I sure hope you don't believe what you just wrote.
Now, I see why you have the reputation you do. I sure hope you don't believe what you just wrote.
Actually I agree with some of that myself, ever listen to much rap music and the desire for many to be "thugs" or live the "thug' life?
Its like its celebrated. Sickening.
Now, I see why you have the reputation you do. I sure hope you don't believe what you just wrote.
no, it was said in humor, directed to a friend who, I'm sure, got it
I used to work in a couple of failing urban primarily black high schools here in New York. I heard the word used a hundred times a day, every day. Heck, I got called "n*****" more often then I got called "cracker" or "whitey" :chuckle:
Still remember the first time a little black seventh grader looked up at me and said "n*****, you can't make me do this"
I laughed so hard tears were rolling down my cheeks.
Amazing what lengths some people will go to in order to justify speaking and thinking like a complete waste of skin.
Having been on the receiving end of racial slurs ....
You are talking about inner city poor Urban Culture though. That is not synonymous with Black Culture.
Your intent is, at the root, no different. It rests on an ugly foundation or it's meaningless. What makes the usage funny else? Outside of it's shock value which relies on that derogatory understanding it's just a sound you make.
You aren't fooling anyone with this except, possibly, yourself.
I really don't think you are racist but if you throw comments around like that carelessly around here, you will get the reputation of a racist.
No, Trad's point was quite right. Using the word for shock value is very different from the way it was used by the racist. Are you really trying to deny this? Res nailed it: his intent is absolutely different. And Trad's primary point was that origin does not determine whether usage is evil, which is fairly obvious.
It's actually analogous to your shock value when you call a man "Sally" in a visitor message. Any shock and potential humor derive from the facts that:
1. Sally is a derogatory way to call a man feminine.
2. Such a strong, insulting turn of events catches the hearer off-guard.
3. It is clear that you are not actually intending the word in the derogatory sense: you are not actually calling him a Sally.
...that's why you always follow such a thing with "" Your own usage rests on the same ugly foundation. Origin isn't a very good argument.
I know of many who have moved to poorer small towns in rural areas of america, and they brought their thugging and mugging with them.
Seems cultural to me - since it wasnt till many of them moved to those places that their crime rates skyrocketed.
(Katrina refugees invited to small towns across america)
Nice to show their thanks.
But it was poor, urban culture they brought with them. It has nothing to do with the color of their skin.
I really don't think you are racist but if you throw comments around like that carelessly around here, you will get the reputation of a racist.
Funny, poor rural culture do not behave the same way. Can you explain that?