LIberal plows into crowd of liberals in Va
- Thread starter Nick M
- Start date
- Status
It didn't take the President three days to denounce that individual - nor did he make any attempt to lead by example by toning down his rhetoric!
I live in Charlottesville where this happened. I went down to the battle zone and did some photog. It was unbelievable! There was an incredible amount of firepower. Guys with AR-15's everywhere. Jason Kessler, the organizer, is a bit of mixed nut bag. The Left leaning Southern Poverty Law Center here in C-ville dug up a strange fact about Kessler all things considered. Kessler was part of Occypy Wall Street AND an Obama supporter! The same month Trump was elected, Kessler "suddenly" changed and became a Trump supporter.
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/jason-kessler
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/jason-kessler
Last edited:
How?
Whether or not you think or the infant does should mean what in relation to your rights? You can die from drinking too much water. Does that lessen your legitimacy? Of course not.
So intelligence is your litmus for right? That's a dangerous slope to play on.
He is if you understand Him.
That's one standard. Arbitrary as all of them are, empirically speaking, but less rational than many and inconsistent if you value intelligence, which is present long before birth.
The people who organized it called the association and support. It is reasonable to assert that people who show up for a Scout jamboree understand what they're attending for the most part.
They do by association and alignment. I'm not suggesting that to be a conservative, even a hard right winger, is to be a racist or Nazi sympathizer, or White Nationalist, only that it doesn't exclude the possibility and that these racists find supporting a right wing agenda in their best interests. That invites a reasonable consideration of why.
You don't have to. They'll tell you. They're proud of it.
You can see that he isn't being accosted and the symbols he's wearing aren't ambiguous.
Almost anything is possible, but much less is reasonable. So when I see a Nazi salute it is possible that the fellow has a nervous tic, but more likely that he means something by it.
When we drape ourselves in meaningful symbols we invite the association. It is reasonable to make it and unreasonable to see ambiguity within the expression, even if there's a mathematical possibility of it.
I'm guessing this one is for the "depends on what you mean by 'it'" and I'd say it's necessarily so, not potentially so. I'd be happy to illustrate the why if your response wasn't merely rhetorical device.
It is not present before birth, but the potential is there. The machine is not activated yet. Folic acid and other Cs tend to cause miscarriages in fetuses with serious defects. Your woman may not like her miscarriage, but God would know that she has a right to it, not a right to God himself. It makes little sense for God to give the afterlife to something with a birth defect automatically or to desire for some humans to have slight FAS or even great FAS thus making some men physical/mentally unequal easily.
The only difference between an infant a moment before its birth and after is experience, not intelligence. The infant you want to reduce to mechanism is very much aware. Unimpaired infants are born knowing their mother's voice. My son knew mine. I sang and spoke to him for much of the pregnancy. When he was getting his first bath Jack was distinctly unhappy and crying until I called him by name. He calmed immediately. When continued washing cause a recurrence of his temper I spoke again. Every time I did he calmed. The nurse's voice had no effect on him.
No, it's just relatively inexperienced and primitive. But then, intelligence is simply one arbitrary litmus to begin with. It isn't inherently meaningful as a point of vestment of right except to the person who believes that to be meaningful.
All sorts of things can cause a miscarriage. None of that has any necessary bearing on right or vestment. You can die from a fever long after you're born. It has no significance in relation to your being or right except by the association you impart.
It makes less sense for a finite being to dictate the conscience or understanding of an intelligence he cannot grasp.
It was the vice mayor who started this controversy about 1 1/2 years ago concerning the civil war statue of Lee which frankly none of us cared about, black or white.
Read the tweets of the vice mayor that Kessler dug up: warning, graphic! http://www.cavalierdaily.com/article/2016/11/wes-bellamy-charlottesville-twitter
Read the tweets of the vice mayor that Kessler dug up: warning, graphic! http://www.cavalierdaily.com/article/2016/11/wes-bellamy-charlottesville-twitter
No, it isn't, and it is absolutely expected by the Most High. If he wasn't, we may as well call him the most low, and most irrelevant. Still, my miscarriage means that I don't even have a brother who existed, and thou cannot prove it to have partially existed as an intelligence. In the holy bible, plants aren't considered life.
None of that is objectively true. If you believe it is you should be prepared to present it in parts that sustain the belief.
Rather, when we recognize that an intelligence that can shape our DNA and bring the universe's operating system into being is something we can't encompass, it doesn't reduce him to irrelevance, it only reduces our opinion of Him to it. We can only know about God what God gives us to understand.
Depending on when the miscarriage occurred I might. The human brain is functioning well before birth, again. And again, that's only important to you. It isn't an objective litmus, a necessary point of determining our humanity from some state you seem to believe exists when we do not possess it.
You'll have to share your scripture on the point of your exegesis.
Apparently most of these Civil War statutes were created between 1880 and 1914.
My suggestion would be to have them all moved to Civil War battlefields where they can be positioned to reflect the battles in which they fought.
glassjester
Well-known member
But pre-born babies are.
And folic acid induced abortions prove it does not function. It will only function if birthing. What Planned Parenthood does would cause early birth. While they reason the fetus to be non-thinking, it becomes otherwise when they break the water sack.
My mom's miscarriage means I never had a brother. The mindless fetus was dead before it ever thought a thing.
WizardofOz
New member
What do you mean by 'get rid of'? I think this very mentality is the crux of the problem we're seeing at these events.
Then they aren't preborn anymore.
drbrumley
Well-known member
No doubt!!!!
glassjester
Well-known member
Haha, what?
He/she is just being callous about the life of the unborn.
glassjester
Well-known member
I guess so - it just made no sense. SabathMoon said the pre-born aren't pre-born. What on Earth does that even mean? A = A, you know?
But I am not wrong in being so.
- Status