I said
Same gospel different teachers.
Can you read? Galatians 2:7, Acts 2:38, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4
I said
Same gospel different teachers.
Can you read? Galatians 2:7, Acts 2:38, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4
I said
lolol Read it in context. One Jesus One gospel One Spirit working in both of them.
[Gal 2:7-8
[7] But on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel for the uncircumcised had been committed to me, as [the gospel] for the circumcised [was] to Peter
[8] (for He who worked effectively in Peter for the apostleship to the circumcised also worked effectively in me toward the Gentiles),
LOL yourself. You do not know how to rightly divide the Word.
Thank you, peanut gallery. If you care to contribute, I am still looking for anyone representative of your position to clearly state what it is they are believing and be prepared to elaborate in response to questions.
I was searching the Greek and not the English.From King James source text, communicate occurs in 4 verses, 6 if I include communicated. Preach occurs in 44 verses. If I expand "preach" to include preached, preaches, and preaching we are up to 134 verses. Since you are attaching significance to those numbers, why are yours different?
Irrelevant. God sent Paul to COMMUNICATE to the leadership in Jerusalem and NOT to "preach" to them. If they were both preaching the "one true gospel", there would be no need for such a communication.If you are being picky about the word "communicate" and "preach' I will remind you that preaching implies communication. Preaching that does not communicate meaning is worthless. "Preach" includes εὐαγγελίζω and κηρύσσω: including to announce, declare, bring, herald, preach, proclaim, publish. Preaching is a form of communication. If you object to a synonym that "you communicate while there are people to hear" it seems that you are grasping at straws rather than substance.
I've given you substantiation, you just don't listen.Substantiation, please. I've been asking over and over for substantiation, which has not been forthcoming from you or other representatives of your position.
Substantiation please.The same gospel is communicated to different audiences and one uses different approaches. One gospel with identical means and and identical end, just different starting points of understanding.
Is the message to Abraham that he would have a son GOOD NEWS?For consistency's sake, do you count God's message to Abraham that he would have a son as another gospel? If you are using different terms of reference to designate different gospels, do you also acknowledge fourteen different gospels within the New Testament? If the Sons of Zebedee had published "The Weekly Sun" would there be fifty-two different gospels every year?
Otherwise I don't see the New Testament writers making such a distinction. They consistently speak of the gospel, singular, not plural, and the only modern term for "gospels" means Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. But if you can show me how there are different messages called "the gospel" that have different means and a different end, I may be willing to grant the existence of "different" gospels.
:cigar:
I said
lol What would we do without your intellectual response?
Hey Squeaky, you always post numerous Scripture verses, however, it would be rational/reasonable if you were to correlate those, same Scriptures into the 'point' you're trying to make. Now, doesn't that sound reasonable to you? (Most likely, NOT.)
Hey Squeaky, you always post numerous Scripture verses, however, it would be rational/reasonable if you were to correlate those, same Scriptures into the 'point' you're trying to make. Now, doesn't that sound reasonable to you? (Most likely, NOT.)
I was searching the Greek and not the English.
Irrelevant. God sent Paul to COMMUNICATE to the leadership in Jerusalem and NOT to "preach" to them. If they were both preaching the "one true gospel", there would be no need for such a communication.
I've given you substantiation, you just don't listen.
Substantiation please.
Is the message to Abraham that he would have a son GOOD NEWS?
Is the message that Abraham would be the father of many nations GOOD NEWS?
Are those TWO "good news'" the IDENTICAL same "good news"? (Hint:no, they are not).
The gospel of the kingdom is the GOOD NEWS about the kingdom.
The gospel of the grace of God is the GOOD NEWS about the grace of God.
Etc., etc., etc.
I said
dont you know that in order to find the Holy Spirit one must purge their minds of reason and logic.
[1Co 5:7-8
[7] Therefore purge out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, since you truly are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us.
[8] Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened [bread] of sincerity and truth.
[Gal 5:9
[9] A little leaven leavens the whole lump.
I said
lol There is nothing reasonable about faith, or logic about the Word of God. Your reasonable is one of mans deceptions. There is no way of demonstrating the Holy Spirit by useing reason and logic.
[1Co 2:1-2, 4-7
[1] And I, brethren, when I came to you, did not come with excellence of speech or of wisdom declaring to you the testimony of God.
[2] For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. ...
[4] And my speech and my preaching [were] not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
[5] that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.
[6] However, we speak wisdom among those who are mature, yet not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
[7] But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden [wisdom] which God ordained before the ages for our glory,
How do those Scripture verses above say, "We must purge our minds of reason and logic? Ironically I say, what you said, makes no logical sense nor is it reasonable.
Communicating with you is equivalent to throwing a drowning man a glass of water.
Communicating with you is equivalent to throwing a drowning man a glass of water.
Yeah, it's always comical when someone makes a statement of supposed reason or logic in order to defeat the use of reason and logic.
Pure reason and logic find their ultimate source in GOD Himself.
Blind leaps of faith apart from reason never connect with the true GOD.
Exactly the reason that I quit putting forth the effort years ago.
Yeah, it's always comical when someone makes a statement of supposed reason or logic in order to defeat the use of reason and logic.
Pure reason and logic find their ultimate source in GOD Himself.
Blind leaps of faith apart from reason never connect with the true GOD.