Possibly we do not speak the same version of English, as I am in Australia and possibly you are in the USA. To give you the benefit of the doubt I looked up Webster’s instead of my Macquarie Dictionary. Webster defines these two words in the sense that I meant them. If you do not have a print copy then you may find an electronic copy – I used an electronic copy. Now after you look up Webster’s please check if the following shows that Wisdom is depicted as a separate entity, and my understanding of this is that Wisdom here is a personification, not a person.
Why are you still stonewalling against the questions I asked you?
When you say "Wisdom is depicted as a separate entity",
- what (if anything) do you mean by "separate"?
- what (if anything) do you mean by "entity"?
So far, you've refused to even try to answer either of these questions. Why is that?
You'll observe that I did not ask you what some dictionary editor may mean by those words. I asked you what (if anything)
you mean by them, and so far you have not specified an answer to either of my questions.
"Webster defines these two words...."
Here is what Webster wrote in his entry for the adjective, 'separate':
SEP'ARATE, adjective [Latin separatus.]
1. Divided from the rest; being parted from another; disjoined; disconnected; used of things that have been united or connected.
2. Unconnected; not united; distinct; used of things that have not been connected.
Christ was holy, harmless, undefiled and separate from sinners. Hebrews 7:26.
3. Disunited from the body; as a separate spirit; the separate state of souls. |
Which (if any) of these things do you mean by your word, "separate", when you say "Wisdom is depicted as a separate entity"?
Are you saying that, in Proverbs 8,
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an entity divided from the rest]"? (From the rest of what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an entity being parted from another]"? (From another what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as a [disjoined entity]"? (Disjoined from what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as a [disconnected entity]"? (Disconnected from what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an entity that is a thing that has been united]"? (United to what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an entity that is a thing that has been connected]"? (Connected to what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an unconnected entity]"? (Unconnected from what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an entity not united]"? (Not united to what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as a [distinct entity]"? (Distinct from what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an entity that is a thing that has not been connected]"? (Not been connected to what?)
- "Wisdom is depicted as [an entity disunited from the body]"? (Disunited from what body?)
And,
here is what Webster wrote in his entry for the noun, 'entity':
EN'TITY, noun [Low Latin entitas.] Being; existence.
Fortune is no real entity
1. A real being, or species of being.
|
Is that what you're saying, when you call the Wisdom spoken of in Proverbs 8 an "entity"? Are you saying that the Wisdom spoken of in Proverbs 8 is a real being, or species of being?
Proverbs 8:12–31 (KJV): 12 I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions. 22 The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. 23 I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was. 24 When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water. 25 Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth: 26 While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world. 27 When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth: 28 When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep: 29 When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth: 30 Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him; 31 Rejoicing in the habitable part of his earth; and my delights were with the sons of men.
Back to where this all started in our “discussion”, I suggest that the “Word” in John 1:1 is a similar personification to the wise woman “Wisdom” in Proverbs 8.
You've already demonstrated that you can quote from Proverbs 8, and that you can assert, and reassert, falsehood about it, and about John 1, without being able to rationally account for your assertions.
Do you feel better after your reassertion of your falsehood, and your failure to even try to rationally account for it?
I love how you keep referring to your mindless reassertion of your falsehood, and your mindless repetition of a Bible text, and your persistent stonewalling against the questions I've asked you, as "our "discussion"". You are, indeed, right to admit that you are trying to not have a discussion, and, of course, it is no wonder why you are trying to not have a discussion. Anybody who, like you, tries to take refuge in the "Just go look up--in any source
you consider to be a dictionary--what
I meant by what
I said"-shtick, is thereby advertising that you know you have no answer to the question, "What did you mean by what you wrote?"
Since, by your "go look it up" shtick, you have deliberately granted me carte blanche to decide what you meant by your saying that "Wisdom is depicted as a separate entity", I'll go right ahead and take you up on your offer. Therefore, when you say, "Wisdom is depicted as a separate entity", you mean, according to Webster, that "Wisdom is depicted as a real being disunited from the body". That is what you have told me, by your "go look it up" reaction to my question. So, then, from what
body are you saying Wisdom is being depicted as being
disunited?