Under Pressure
Member
That's just stupid. The NT nowhere explicitly or implicitly supports such nonsense.Duel nature, human and divine in one person.
That's just stupid. The NT nowhere explicitly or implicitly supports such nonsense.Duel nature, human and divine in one person.
The implication is that because Jesus had been given the power of life from "god" he could "raise" himself from the dead.
This is a HUGE stumbling block for trinitarians. Their solution is to ignore the greater part of the Bible that don't fit their theology.
Hey, why not?
That's just stupid. The NT nowhere explicitly or implicitly supports such nonsense.
The "anti Jesus is 'god' crowd" aren't the ones with the problem.The Jews suffered from the same stumbling block as the anti Jesus is God crowd.
And what would be the reason I reject the "man god" hypothesis?According to your arguments, had you heard Jesus back then you would have rejected him on the same grounds that you reject him now.
The NT neither explicitly or implicitly supports the notion that Jesus was divine. In fact, it often goes out of its way to say that Jesus IS NOT "god."Or at least his divinity.
:rotfl:Billions of others diciples of Jesus disagree with you.
Or maybe it's yours? :idunno:Maybe it's your problem?
You are claiming that Jesus was double-minded?
James 1:8
8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
The NT neither explicitly or implicitly supports the notion that Jesus was divine.
But he was a partaker of the divine nature the same as we are.
Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. (2 Peter 1:4)
About what?Yes, nonsense is what the religious "experts" said to Jesus.
Jesus was never "god." Not even temporarily.The adversaries have Jesus as a temporary God man floating out in space for a time.
About what?
You really need to read "John's gospel" closer. Have you ever noticed that the people in it NEVER seem to understand what Jesus is saying?
Jesus was never "god." Not even temporarily.
:think:((( Romans 3:10-13 KJV )))
Now!!!,,, Genius ~of your ~god SATAN, -- Prove that YOU are not ONE of those!!!
You define what Jesus has to be in order for you to accept Him before reading the Bible to see what the Bible actually says about Him?Jesus and God are the same thing, with that in mind reread all the NT.
Your misunderstanding of what Jesus said, combined with your refusal to accept all the many places where Jesus said something that doesn't fit your idea of what He should have said instead of what He actually said, does not add up to Jesus being the one that misspoke, but it does add up to you trying to mislead many.To follow the arguments of the Arius people, Jesus misspoke a lot and mislead many.
Of course Jesus was not double minded.NO!!!!! --- Jesus Was Not Double Minded!!!
:shocked:Jesus was the first to BE (( Triple Minded ));
Of course Jesus was not double minded.
Jesus was the most single minded person ever, as shown by His obedience to God unto death on the cross.
:shocked:
No, you can be single-minded in your stupidity.Just because one is "Single Minded", doesn't mean that that foolish MIND is With Christ!!!
Colossians 3:22 22 Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God; |
Philippians 2:5-8 5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. |
About what?
You really need to read "John's gospel" closer. Have you ever noticed that the people in it NEVER seem to understand what Jesus is saying?
Jesus was never "god." Not even temporarily.
You define what Jesus has to be in order for you to accept Him before reading the Bible to see what the Bible actually says about Him?
You do realize that is the worst possible way of reading the Bible, right?