Prizebeatz1
New member
Is it more probable that "No one goes to the father except through me" is about a man or does it refer to the infinite and eternal part of us? Which makes more sense?
I would say yes for the most part. But would you say it is more likely that Jesus literally raised a man from the dead or is it more likely the miracle points to reconnecting with the lost child-like part of us and thus renewing our sense of purpose in life for example? Would it be more likely that Jesus was literally born of a virgin or would it be more likely that it points to the unconditional, universal and undivided nature of the soul? Be honest.
No "or." It's "and."
It's both. That's the point.
Myth-made-fact. Word-made-flesh.
The author became a character.
The Creator entered His creation.
Is this impossible for God to do?
Why do you believe the gospels accurately record Jesus' words, but not His actions?
The literal interpretation does not make sense. Plain and simple.
It places us in position to automatically assume we are worthless on an unconscious level.
You already said that God could enter His own creation.
The gospels claim that He did.
Which part doesn't make sense?
That doesn't follow at all. God loves me... therefore I'm worthless? Come on.
You already said that God could enter His own creation.
The gospels claim that He did.
Which part doesn't make sense?
A man being born from a virgin, the miracles, the resurrection and a man living forever.
Which of these is God incapable of?
I am not debating about God's capabilities.
But that's what it comes down to.
I (and the gospels that you believe) claim that Jesus is God incarnate.
If that part is true, then we're talking about what Jesus could or could not have done, if He is God.
I am challenging the literal interpretation and suggesting that the story of Jesus points to our own divinity. We've been missing the point because we think there is something more important than our own soul. That is why we cannot let go of our belief in Jesus which is a substitute for the feeling of infinite and eternal self-worth. It cannot do the job because there's no replacement for the soul. On a subconscious level we think we are worthless without Jesus. That fear is what keeps us hanging on. Fear does not come from God. It comes from the enemy. The harder we try to hang on the more we reinforce the strength of the adversary. Again, the path to the soul requires letting go, not hanging on. Take a minute to feel the intensity with which we resist. THAT is the power of the enemy. The desire to hang on comes from the strength of man, not of God. It needs to be reversed.
I think I mostly agree with you.
I think the gospel stories function perfectly as symbols, and I think they function as history. The mythological interpretation does not preclude the literal. It's both.
Remember, God's the author. Think of Him creating the universe as writing a story. We're in His story. And so is He.
Here's what I don't get. You accept that God exists, and that He created the universe (right?), and that He could become incarnate, but...
...wouldn't?
...just didn't want to?
...decided "let's not, and say We did" ?
I don't get the last part.
I don't think God created the universe because that would suggest he had a beginning.
No. That would suggest that the universe had a beginning (which it did).
How would that suggest that God had a beginning (which He didn't)?
That's silly talk. God created something that did not exist before.God is everywhere. How could he be separate from anything? God is timeless unity. There is nothing else.
That's silly talk. God created something that did not exist before.
FALLACIOUS reasoning P1.It's silly talk to those who don't know God because they don't know the soul. "I and the father are one." (John 10:30)
FALLACIOUS reasoning P1.
God created something that did NOT exist before.