Apocryphal delights........
Apocryphal delights........
Is that what it says in the bible?
You know you can't really use the same book to verify the validity of that book right?
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Correct,.....its called circular reasoning, confirmation bias, etc. Its similar to "Its true because I say so".
Based on my prior propositions of God's omnipresence, universality and infinity, none here can claim to contain, qualify, constrict, limit, denominate, dictate 'God' the INFINITE. When they claim sole exclusivity of truth, the burden of proof is upon them to provide the evidence, while all the while the one absolute reality is always already What IS. This absolute reality is The Sole Absolute.
From a theosophical context, we can call it 'Deity'....while all other forms or personifications of IT represent 'God' or gods, the various forms of Deity worshipped among the world traditions, each cult of course having its own 'God' or gods. Lets not forget the divine Mother or Goddess as well
See the Holy Spirit as female [URL="http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?127576-Is-the-Holy-Spirit-Female"]here[/URL].
While staying in the Judeo-christian vein, we have not only the canonized bible and koran, but the Apocryphal, intertestamental literature which bridges the time gap inbetween the Old and New Testament, showing also the evolution of doctrine/theology of messianic judaism then morphing into the early schools of Christianity. These non canonical books are part of the sacred writings, even if deemed not as 'inspired' or sanctioned by the church. For instance the Apocrypha was included in the original 1611 KJV bible, and still in the Catholic bible. The ethiopian canon also includes 1 Enoch.