:rotfl:I read and study the Bible.
:rotfl:
Psalms 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.KJVO is nonsense.
says the man who doesn't have a Bible, but a corrupted word of GodClaiming KJV alone is Word of God alone is the logical fallacy of begging the question contradicted by evidence.
It's not "rightly dividing the Word" (why did you capitalize word?). It's rightly dividing the word of truth. You don't even know what the word of truth is, do you?This is arrogance, not rightly dividing the Word or upholding it.
Ironic, innit?:chuckle:
Idiot.Why did I go to my home city and friends first when I was saved before I went to Iceland, LA, St. Lucia?
What evidence? You never offer any!Like JWs, MAD is not interested in evidence contrary to its view. It is selective and ignores credible research in favour of simplistic, non-evidence based ideas.
You read, study and regurgitate what your commentaries say the Bible says.We all read and study the Bible.
Paul was not the first to receive the gospel nor the only.
You read, study and regurgitate what your commentaries say the Bible says.
:blabla:These verses are proof texted out of context by Riplinger, Ruckman, etc. (acerbic mouthpieces who have been exposed and refuted) and have nothing to do with a supposed perfect KJV. You do not even use 1611, but likely use 1769. No one who knows about textual criticism, translation theory, etc. falls for KJVO. The conspiracy theories are ridiculous and evidence is selectively ignored. Again, the preface to KJV by the translators explicitly denies the possibility of the KJVO position. They should know better than you modern guys who spun a unique, divisive, confusing theory relatively recently.
:blabla:
Romans 16:25 Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,
Galatians 1:11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
Galatians 1:12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
Oh please. You rarely post scripture, but go on and on quoting this or that so called scholar or theologian that you agree with.This is an accusation that you guys have made for years without basis.
Why does Paul call it my gospel?None of these verses exegeted in context have anything to do with MAD. Proof texting is the pitfall of cults and false teachings, not biblical, balanced views.
1 Timothy 1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.Paul was not the first to receive the gospel nor the only.
That's odd. I have no problem believing the words on the pageI can think critically. You would not be able to accurately use KJV without Oxford Dictionary (yet disdain Greek lexicons?!), would not understand first century customs, coins, references, etc. without aids, etc.
waitingIt's not "rightly dividing the Word" (why did you capitalize word?). It's rightly dividing the word of truth. You don't even know what the word of truth is, do you?
You haven't put in any effort. That's why you deserve to be mocked.Are you channelling Lighthouse or STP?
I respond to arguments, not mock the one who put an effort in.
Why does Paul call it my gospel?
Why does Paul write that it was kept secret since the world began, but now is made manifest...?
If something was "kept secret since the world began, but now is made manifest..." was it known before that? A yes or no answer will suffice.
1 Timothy 1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.