If its just love, why shouldnt incest be ok?

ClimateSanity

New member
I'm guessing he would include punching bag on that list.

Has he admitted to punching women? Other than self defense, what has he claimed to be a legitimate reason to hit a woman? If he turns out to be innocent, you are behaving just like the MSM. That would explain why you guys believe what they tell you.
 

serpentdove

BANNED
Banned
I fail to see what use woman can be to man, if one excludes the function of bearing children.

–Saint Augustine
Do you agree with
emot-airquote.gif
Saint Augustine? :smokie:
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Seems to be that people somehow "choose" to go against the 'natural' in order to be homosexual. Yet I've yet to hear any sort of convincing argument as to how a supposedly natural heterosexual person can 'choose' such an unnatural attraction...

Men have sex with men in prison because they are depraved. Their conscious is dead enough to where it doesn't matter to them, and they build their desire upon it.
And it is no different for men outside of prison.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
That's just your hallucination. Outside of hipster college students (snowflakes), social justice warriors (far leftists), and divorced women with bones in the closet, people don't see you all's obsession with women's interest anything other than a mental illness.

By 'people' you effectively mean you.

You're so far off the planet the moon's taking cover.

What. A. Nut.
 

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
Hardly. Most married couples aren't Catholic and most married couples don't care if the pope gives his seal of approval or not.
And?
People who are married are married, there is no valid marriage and no invalid marriage.
False.
We started out with couple A and couple B, both couples are incapable of producing children. You want to label couple A as engaging in "personal, physical gratification" for having sex. At the same time you label the sexual activities of couple B as the "unitive purpose of conjugal relations". The difference between couples A and B is that you view couple B as "validly married", (as defined by the supreme partnorship of the Church). A double standard based on membership in your particular religion.
You avoided and continue to avoid the question I actually asked, which is, "Define the "sexual activities" for couple A and for couple B." "Sexual activities" is your term.

So go ahead and do that, and we'll see where we are with all this "double standard" and "special pleading" and "membership in your particular religion" business.
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Sexual acts are independent of orientation.

A straight man having sex with another man is the bane of you all's notions. It shows the depravity for what it is, rather then what it is not which according to you is an 'innate trait'.
 

MrDante

New member
And?
False.
You avoided and continue to avoid the question I actually asked, which is, "Define the "sexual activities" for couple A and for couple B." "Sexual activities" is your term.

So go ahead and do that, and we'll see where we are with all this "double standard" and "special pleading" and "membership in your particular religion" business.

Yes married couples of different religions are as "validly" married as Catholic couples. Pretending that somehow they are not doesn't diminish their marriages in the least but it does reveal you to be a small and petty individual.
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
What does that even mean?

It means that when gay rights movements consist of half naked (and sometimes fully naked) people resembling nothing but hedonists, it is not because they are innately gay but are just HEDONISTS.

Do you not understand?
Le tme put it another way- liberal society has done nothing but MAKE THINGS UP to divinize the 'gay man'. And for one reason- to use it as a club to bash Christianity with.
 

MrDante

New member
It means that when gay rights movements consist of half naked (and sometimes fully naked) people resembling nothing but hedonists, it is not because they are innately gay but are just HEDONISTS.

Do you not understand?
Le tme put it another way- liberal society has done nothing but MAKE THINGS UP to divinize the 'gay man'. And for one reason- to use it as a club to bash Christianity with.

Make things up like Gays have a life expectancy of 42 years? Or make things up like gays have thousands and thousands of sexual partners? or make things up like gays recruit children? Or make things up like homosexuals controlled the Nazi Party and were responsible for the Holocaust? Or making things up like the gay rights movement consists of naked hedonists?
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
the gay rights movement consists of naked hedonists?

'Innately' gay people should be walking down the streets holding hands with candles, not parading down them naked with face paint and fetish outfits.

They are their own refutation :wave:
 

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
Yes married couples of different religions are as "validly" married as Catholic couples. Pretending that somehow they are not doesn't diminish their marriages in the least but it does reveal you to be a small and petty individual.
Well you're definitely winning the game of "avoid the issue/discussion/question/point," so, I guess you get a ribbon or a trophy for that.
 
Top