This only works if you lie about the meaning of natural.
If its just love, why shouldnt incest be ok?
- Thread starter Angel4Truth
- Start date
This only works if you lie about the meaning of natural.
Let me break it down for you, you extravagant moron:
What good did women do in ancient times besides bear children?
A women can't do jack without a man in those conditions. What, the whole of society is going to readjust to secure the mentality of an unclean woman? These weren't virgins or betrothed women- men were put to death for raping them. These women were harlots
The only thing you have done here is show off your own insecurity as a man.
Let's see.
No, same yardstick.
Are couple A and couple B both validly married, as defined by the supreme pastorship of the Church?
Define the "sexual activities" for couple A and for couple B.
That's never true, so long as both couples are validly married, according to the Church's magisterium, and so long as they are engaging in "the same thing."
Returning again to your initial claim:
Clearly, no I don't.
Basic math.
No, you're just a feminized tool is all, trained to believe the world must stop for the interests of women. It's one of the prime things in your arsenal you can whip out whenever the Bible is brought up- one would think you all would get tired of your own platitudes after a while.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Let me break it down for you, you extravagant moron:
What good did women do in ancient times besides bear children?
A women can't do jack without a man in those conditions. What, the whole of society is going to readjust to secure the mentality of an unclean woman? These weren't virgins or betrothed women- men were put to death for raping them. These women were harlots
Oh, nothing dude, they just got in the way of everything.
What a moron...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Seems to be that people somehow "choose" to go against the 'natural' in order to be homosexual. Yet I've yet to hear any sort of convincing argument as to how a supposedly natural heterosexual person can 'choose' such an unnatural attraction...
Lol, they served man.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh right, they made the beds, cooked food and all that. Sorry, I forgot that's all that women are good for outside of bearing kids. My mistake.
I fail to see what use woman can be to man, if one excludes the function of bearing children.
–Saint Augustine
How about serving as man's exemplar of love, humility and respect! :idea:
most couples aren't and most don't care.
Hasn't you papa had that little talk with you yet?
Still engaging in special pleading. You have a different set of criteria for different couples based on their religion. Sad.
Apparently I'm a threat to your fragile masculinity too.
I'm guessing he would include punching bag on that list.
You're the one who must lean on women and their interests to have any standing. How masculine is that
gcthomas
New member
You're the one who must lean on women and their interests to have any standing. How masculine is that
It must be very lonely to be rejected by men as a misogynist when women won't come near you either. Who is left on your side?
That's just your hallucination. Outside of hipster college students (snowflakes), social justice warriors (far leftists), and divorced women with bones in the closet, people don't see you all's obsession with women's interest anything other than a mental illness.
Avoided question # 1.
Avoided question # 2.
Still not doing that.
No I don't.
Hardly. Most married couples aren't Catholic and most married couples don't care if the pope gives his seal of approval or not. People who are married are married, there is no valid marriage and no invalid marriage.
We started out with couple A and couple B, both couples are incapable of producing children. You want to label couple A as engaging in "personal, physical gratification" for having sex. At the same time you label the sexual activities of couple B as the "unitive purpose of conjugal relations". The difference between couples A and B is that you view couple B as "validly married", (as defined by the supreme partnorship of the Church). A double standard based on membership in your particular religion.