You are making up things.
And yet I'm providing scripture to back up my arguments, and even using the ones you post as evidence for my position.
You say you follow Paul, then tell me right here and now what it is that people misunderstood about Paul. See 2 Peter 3:16.
*Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and blameless; *and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, *as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures. - 2 Peter 3:14-16
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2Peter3:14-16&version=NKJV
"In which are some things hard to understand"
The difference between the Covenant of Law, which was given by God to the nation of Israel, and the Covenant of Grace, which was given to all who believe in Christ as their Savior.
In other words, to people who are under the Covenant of Law, aka the Nation of Israel, the Covenant of Grace is hard to understand, that covenant which was given to both the Jews and Gentiles, because it's so drastically different than the Covenant of Law.
I am not listening to your false teachers.
Once again, you aren't even trying to understand both sides of the discussion. I have been patient with you across many threads, responding to as many posts as I could where you present your side of the argument. The LEAST you could do is hear my position on the discussion and then reject it using your evidence, instead of just ignoring it outright. By ignoring it, you state very cleary: "GT's position is correct, and GT doesn't care what you have to say, if it opposes GT's position, then it is wrong, because GT's position is correct."
GT, I will tell you this right now, if someone can show me that my position is wrong, I will change my views. Unfortunately, no one has yet been willing to take me up on that challenge. Perhaps you can be the first. But it requires going to links, listening to what I have been listening to, and hearing my side of the discussion with a clear mind, being able to consider an argument without actually accepting it. That is the reason I ask so many questions on threads, because I want to try to understand the point that is being made, so that when I respond, I can respond to the argument that is being made, and not just my opinion of it.
The 3 shows of Bob Enyart Live that I linked to above focus on the difference between the Body of Christ and the Bride of Christ, and actually does show that there is a difference.
But no, GT is too stubborn and set in her ways to even consider the views that go against her own.
You know what the Bible calls people who refuse to listen to reason? The Bible calls them fools. You are a fool, GT, I'm trying to reason with you, and you refuse to even consider my argument, just because you think (and wrongly so) that my pastor (who has been studying the Bible for around 40 years) is a false teacher, even though you have no idea what he says because you refuse to listen to him.
