Doesn't look good for the Bern in PA.
I guess not, looking at that? If she wins large in Pennsylvania, and I think she will win large in New York, it is over.
I rather hope Trump loses.
Last edited:
Doesn't look good for the Bern in PA.
In PA Clinton is beating Sanders.
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/20...n-strong-lead-trump-and-kasich-battle-it-out/
Darn.
I will go on record stating Sanders will win Wisconsin, and most of the left coast. Yet he will still lose when Hillary Clinton wins in Pennsylvania, New York and new JerseyApparently it's close in Wisconsin though, and:
On the same day that a new poll found Bernie Sanders edging Hillary Clinton 49%-48% nationally, the Sanders campaign announced a big rally in Madison, Wisconsin on Saturday.
I will go on record stating Sanders will win Wisconsin, and most of the left coast. Yet he will still lose when Hillary Clinton wins in Pennsylvania, New York and new Jersey
It wold be something if she lost New York, wouldn't it?![]()
If she lost in New York, she might lose the general election to either Cruz, or Trump. I very much doubt she will lose these states.
I doubt Sanders can win at this point. He would have to win California, new York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey by a landslide.
If Hillary Clinton wins any of these states, she will be the party nominee.
Wall Street will choose Hillary over Bernie, so I'm sure you're right, but I can dream...
I'd like to see Bernie win.
so called respectable trump supporters like laura ingraham
-can't believe what trump is doing to cruz's wife
-they are being tested
-and
-it will get worse
-they will wonder why they feel so dirty
You would not throw away a new Toyota Camry, would you? If I did not side with Wall Street, it would, for me, be worse than tossing away the new car every year.
Everyone votes self-interestedly. For some it's agreement with their financial ends, for others its a service to some notion they find personally satisfactory, but no one is above it. The distinction is found in what constitutes that interest.So, your vote is a kinda amoral calculation of what benefits you personally? Well, at least you're honest about it. Another thing you are is outnumbered.
Everyone votes self-interestedly. For some it's agreement with their financial ends, for others its a service to some notion they find personally satisfactory, but no one is above it. The distinction is found in what constitutes that interest.
Everyone serves their highest idea, even if they don't call it that.If you incorporate morality into self-interest, sure. On some level, morality must be in your own interest.
I think it's essential. Makes it easier to understand what drives people and harder to skip that and go straight into judgment.But then, I'm not sure that's a very useful way to look at it.
Everyone votes self-interestedly.
Everyone serves their highest idea, even if they don't call it that.
I think it's essential. Makes it easier to understand what drives people and harder to skip that and go straight into judgment.