1Way
+OL remote satellite affiliate
BCK - Great stuff. You said
You've really clarified things for me, thanks and much appreciated.
No. God can be all knowing, if you allow the scope of what can be known to what is knowable. So I see where I disagree with Boyd. He is too philosophical and going out on a limb that I thought was cut off by open theism. There simply is no good reason to say that God must have all knowledge prior to existence. The open view allows a God that can learn new things, yet He still seems stuck with a God that must at least theoretically know all things and then just through away what did not actually come to pass. Although I really dislike his phrasing which is that He does not actualize what He does not want to happen or something like that. That sounds just plain silly. You go on saying.Well, if God can’t know it all. Then the charge that the Open View posits a non-Omniscient God is valid.
I disagree with Boyd then. There is no need to salvage anything, you simply do not interject the unbiblical notion that God's foreknowledge must mean that He knows everything including things that are unknowable. Again, all you have to have is one unknown option per ever 1 million years, and if that uncertainty goes on for all eternity, you could NEVER know it all, because there will always be more uncertain events that have not happened yet, and there is no end to them so you can not possibly know it all, there is no all in an actual infinity, there is only endlessness. You saidIf God can know it all but all doesn’t include the future decisions of free will agents, for these are not realized facts, then you salvage God’s Omniscience. I think that is what Boyd does.
You say permutations, I say stick with the number one and then plug in eternity. You have one random or uncertain event per minuet or day or millennium, it does not matter, when you have that happening for all of eternity, you have an infinite unending amount of uncertain events and by definition, you can not know them all, since there is no possible way to get all of them, there will always be more, it never ends, you can never know them all. The future is a long long, very long way away, it's unending it's so long.Well, I would disagree. I think Boyd might to. I don’t think that the number of permutations of possible future outcomes is limitless.
You've really clarified things for me, thanks and much appreciated.