It's not a problem if you or others consider it a bad idea for people to be unchaste, it's kind of a given really. According to Jefferson, this thread is about whether "liberals" have any standards at all where it comes to sexual morality which could have been addressed a whole load better than a definition of a derogatory term to start with. Got better things to do than call folk sluts if they've had sex outside of the marriage bed really.
But you do agree that promiscuity and sluttiness are OK. God says otherwise.
Many of us did not remain virgins until wedlock, but that is not God's way.
Thanks Mr. Cliche
Hmm, quote me on either of the first two or else you're just making stuff up. I don't use the term "sluttiness" either.
Sluttiness is equivalent to promiscuousness..
There was a TYPO that you should have immediately recognized. The word NOT was missing. My mistake.... FIXED.
Sleep around, it's OK... signed AB.
Which means what exactly, not remaining absolutely chaste until marriage? Eh, you go around calling folk sluts all you want if ya like. You'll just be a pompous bore with delusions of superiority.
God's way is not unclear. It is chastity until marriage. Why does this come as such a shock to you?
Yes, I call promiscuous women sluts. I'm not sure what the term for men that do the same, but they are no better.
False accusation Mr. Decider. I simply go by what God says. You don't seem to like what God says.
Thanks for the advise. I'm sure that you never make mistakes.
Yes. So what's your point? You seem to keep trying to justify that behavior.
Cute.
It's odd how many times the Bible is completely foreign to you.
Then hey there Captain Perfect, you carry on calling your fellow human beings sluts, "bad girls" and whatever. Sure, I make mistakes, plenty of em' in fact but I'm not a pompous, stuck up bore thankfully.
It's odd how you don't seem to recognize how pompous religious legalists don't fare too well in the very same book.
Please show the post where I claimed to be PERFECT.
My fellow human being do lots of things wrong, as do I. But I don't abandon God's rules.
Blah, blah... blah.
But you condone ungodly sexual behavior.
Perhaps you should speak against it then.
False accusations from a would-be correcter.
Oh lighten up dude, course you ain't perfect but when you act like a puritan then eh, do the math. You set yourself up for stuff.
What accusations? You can carry on as you will and call any woman a "bad girl" if she's had sex before marriage all you want. I'm simply pointing out that pompous legalists don't fare too well in the Bible. Problem?
Dogs...But personally, I consider that unfair to canines; whom I have a great deal of respect for.
Pigs, womanizers, philanderers.Dogs...But personally, I consider that unfair to canines; whom I have a great deal of respect for.
Repugnant! Sexist! Ladies who play the field a bit enjoy the experience. It's not for the guy. Ladies unlike males want to eventually settle down with a man they love. And it is not based on physical traits or body parts like it is with most men.
Well, I used to be a male chauvinist but I learned that bitches hate that stuff.
Really? I've known plenty of women who have a conpletely different set of standards for what you say women have. I knew women as far back as the 1960s who based their sex lives on physical attraction and those numbers have not gone down.
