glorydaz
Well-known member
As opposed to being disease affected?
Yeah, like those horrible measles. :rotfl:
Get the measles you're over it in two weeks.
Get the shots and you're brain damaged for life.
As opposed to being disease affected?
Yeah, sew me up, but don't experiment on my grandkids.
Big Pharma has so many additives in those vaccines. It's no wonder we're in the shape we're in.
Parents should have the right and ability to decide what medication their kids will receive.
Those two things are almost gone.
Yeah, like those horrible measles. :rotfl:
Get the measles you're over it in two weeks.
Get the shots and you're brain damaged for life.
Must. Be. Polite...Have you had the MMR vaccination? If so, did it damage your brain for life?
:crackup:Must. Be. Polite...
There's plenty of those, carved into stone, all over the world, they're called: graveyards. When vaccines were first invented, infant, child, youth and even adult deaths declined rapidly; just like when doctors first started washing their hands before baby deliveries and maintaining sterile conditions. It all came after the discovery of microbes....it would be nice if they could ever produce any studies and results from an unbiased source.
There's plenty of those, carved into stone, all over the world, they're called: graveyards. When vaccines were first invented, infant, child, youth and even adult deaths declined rapidly;
just like when doctors first started washing their hands before baby deliveries and maintaining sterile conditions. It all came after the discovery of microbes.
A list of studies that show links between autism and the substances found in vaccines.
https://www.learntherisk.org/autism/
To: Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates
Feb. 26, 2019
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.
https://aapsonline.org/measles-outb...vffiwn2dj4TmQFJQWV_5v9vhPdqN011WlMsEPSvticHPM
This is a good read on the subject including the risks involved with vaccinations
From your article:
Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.
The question that needs to be asked (and I've asked this in other Libertarian/Libertarian leaning forums) is:
Does someone have a right to contract a potentially deadly and contagious disease?
Yep, and they're adding more everyday. I have a nephew whose baby was vaccine affected. In fact, my daughter just attended a rally in Salem where hundreds of parents spoke about their children who are altered for life. Not just Autism but other severe reactions. The first thing they ask at the Emergency Room when you bring in a child is if they were recently immunized. That is horrible.
And there is no legal recourse for these parents.
The "potentially deadly" part is super hyped in most cases (such as measles, chicken pox etc), and contracting the measles and other of the normal childhood diseases is a great immune booster. What the vaccines do not guarantee, having had the disease does guarantee...an immunity.
...and contracting the measles and other of the normal childhood diseases is a great immune booster. What the vaccines do not guarantee, having had the disease does guarantee...an immunity.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
The question that needs to be asked (and I've asked this in other Libertarian/Libertarian leaning forums) is:
Does someone have a right to contract a potentially deadly and contagious disease?
I must have missed your answer to my question.
That being said:
U.S. Measles Burden: Before 1963 Vaccine Development*
Each year, measles caused an estimated 3 to 4 million cases
• Close to 500,000 cases were reported annually to CDC, resulting in:
48,000 hospitalizations
1,000 cases with encephalitis (brain swelling)
450 to 500 deaths
https://www.cdc.gov/measles/downloads/measlesdataandstatsslideset.pdf
Regarding this statement:
Ever heard of shingles?
https://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-and-treatments/shingles/shingles-skin#1
There has to be some grounds for sense around the issue IMO. It's going back a while but when I was an infant I was given one of three immunizations against whooping cough and had an adverse reaction to it. The doctor warned (and wow, am I setting myself up here) that I could suffer brain damage if the remaining procedures were to be given. So they weren't and I got the thing. Probably mentioned it before on here but it sure wasn't fun but I don't blame my parents for deciding to go against further treatments.
You need to learn to listen. :chuckle:
And you might also look at both sides of the issue.
There are hundreds of sites out there, but I'm not going to do your research for you.
It's an issue of parental rights versus big Pharma, and one would think you'd bear that in mind.