For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

[Arthur Brain]

It's great to see you gobsmacked already. Trump's appeal has a lot to do what he does to folks like you. You turn to quivering imbeciles because he does not care about your norms. All you can do is wale Oi Blimey! When you see him coming.

Well, Trump doesn't care about anyone or anything besides himself and if you think otherwise then it's no wonder you're so easily duped by the guy. Ho hum.

 

[Arthur Brain]

When a Darwinist is presented with an idea, his first (and usually only) port of call is to mock the source.

They never examine an opposing idea rationally.

Well, that was...something...

 

[Arthur Brain]

Dinesh D'Souza.

That discredited conspiracy crank? Pass...

 

[Arthur Brain]

"It's the canvas, not the count."

Why do Darwinists insist on repeating the same questions as if they have never heard the simple answer.


Of course it is. That's what you foreigners are forever screeching.

Or are you now contending that the election was not legitimate?

Or is this simply another case of you just assuming you have to disagree with everything I say?

It is your contention that the election was legitimate.



Then you should have no issue with lawsuits -- ongoing litigation -- into electoral practices. Yet here you are screeching from across an ocean about stuff you know nothing about.

My assertion that there is an ongoing court case in Georgia? It'll be over before you respond sensibly to that fact.



So?

Why are you so terrified of a legal procedure?

I guess you want to stick with your strange world of make believe.

Well, oh 'foreigner' in turn, I ain't bothered by any legal procedure regarding all of these fraud claims. From Powell's laughable Kraken through to this, it's been pretty entertaining on a sad kinda level and that's not including the times where Trump's lawyers didn't dare claim actual fraud once in court. It isn't my contention that the election was won by Biden Stripe, them's just the facts.

 

[marke]

Well, Trump doesn't care about anyone or anything besides himself and if you think otherwise then it's no wonder you're so easily duped by the guy. Ho hum.

All the unsaved wicked are thoroughly selfish. We think Hitler and Stalin were bad but so is everyone who has not been given new life by Jesus.

Brutal despots around the world have murdered millions of innocent people but American rulers have also hated, persecuted, despised, maligned, falsely accused, disenfranchised, falsely imprisoned and even murdered their enemies as well because of hateful pride and selfishness.

 

[Skeeter]

Just because democrats and lazy republicans conducted shoddy investigations into allegations of fraud does not remove the cloud of suspicion over shady election practices and shady ballot dumps.

How do you know the investigations were shoddy? Your answer: because they did not find fraud.
How do you know there was fraud? Your answer: there was no valid investigation

Your circular reasoning is dizzying!

 

[Stripe]

I ain't bothered by any legal procedure.

Then why insist that everything has been settled?

It hasn't been settled.

There is ongoing litigation.

Just the facts for you foreigners, because you hate looking into things for yourselves.

 

[Skeeter]

"It's the canvas, not the count."

I doubt you understand the distinction you are trying to make here.

In Georgia an identification is required to verify registration of all who vote. Mail in ballots are examined for corresponding signature on the voter registration.

The officials in charge voted for Trump! They are all Republicans. They unreservedly certified the result multiple times. This means nothing to you.

Why do Darwinists insist on repeating the same questions as if they have never heard the simple answer.

Science likes repetition of and convergence of evidence. Parsimonious answers are the simplest that explain everything relevant. Simple answers that leave issues unaddressed are not acceptable.

Creationists believe what they believe and then interpret evidence to support what they believe.

 

[Skeeter]

Then why insist that everything has been settled?

It hasn't been settled.

There is ongoing litigation.

The deadline established by the Constitution has passed. Trump is known to have the strategy to show false strength through legal action. Most of his legal actions lead to nothing. He sued Bill Maher for saying his mother was an orangutan. Legal action in the hopper seems impressive to his devotees who are not the brightest. Smarter folks recognize there is no merit to a claim long before the court's calendar catches up to the nonsense. Sixty out of Sixty-one of Trumps complaints about the election have been dismissed. Get real, Pal.

 

[Right Divider]

Creationists believe what they believe and then interpret evidence to support what they believe.

Darwinists/Evolutionists believe what they believe and then interpret evidence to support what they believe.

The real question is: Which one is better supported by the actual evidence?

Answer: Creation and not "evolution".

 

[Arthur Brain]

Then why insist that everything has been settled?

It hasn't been settled.

There is ongoing litigation.

Just the facts for you foreigners, because you hate looking into things for yourselves.

Cos it has been, done and dusted and the farce might continue in certain areas but it doesn't alter anything. Them's the facts Kiwi..

 

[Arthur Brain]

Darwinists/Evolutionists believe what they believe and then interpret evidence to support what they believe.

The real question is: Which one is better supported by the actual evidence?

Answer: Creation and not "evolution".

This really isn't the thread for it but you've been corrected on this before. Theories come about in science because of the evidence, not the other way round, that's just fact. Creationism starts with a pre-set conclusion before any evidence is even taken into account.

 

[Arthur Brain]

The deadline established by the Constitution has passed. Trump is known to have the strategy to show false strength through legal action. Most of his legal actions lead to nothing. He sued Bill Maher for saying his mother was an orangutan. Legal action in the hopper seems impressive to his devotees who are not the brightest. Smarter folks recognize there is no merit to a claim long before the court's calendar catches up to the nonsense. Sixty out of Sixty-one of Trumps complaints about the election have been dismissed. Get real, Pal.

Bear in mind that Stripe doesn't even understand the basic definition of conspiracy theory.

 

[User Name]

Legal action in the hopper seems impressive to his devotees who are not the brightest. Smarter folks recognize there is no merit to a claim long before the court's calendar catches up to the nonsense.

 

[Stripe]

Cos it has been, done and dusted.

Nope.

There is ongoing litigation.

This really isn't the thread for it but you've been corrected on this before. Theories come about in science because of the evidence, not the other way round, that's just fact. Creationism starts with a pre-set conclusion before any evidence is even taken into account.

Brain tries his Limey luck with science again and again shows his ineptitude.

Theories do not "come about" in science; theories are free -- they can arise in whatever manner they please.

Darwinists love to pretend that the genesis of an idea has some bearing on its veracity.

Bear in mind that Stripe doesn't even understand the basic definition of conspiracy theory.

I looked it up. The dictionary had an image of some Limey.

 

[Right Divider]

This really isn't the thread for it but you've been corrected on this before.

Ok

Theories come about in science because of the evidence, not the other way round, that's just fact.

That's a nice "theory". But it well known that bias plays a heavy role in how the "evidence" is interpreted to create the theory in the first place.

Creationism starts with a pre-set conclusion before any evidence is even taken into account.

So does "evolutionism".

The actual evidence is highly in favor of creation and against evolution (goo to you).

 

[marke]

How do you know the investigations were shoddy? Your answer: because they did not find fraud.
How do you know there was fraud? Your answer: there was no valid investigation

Your circular reasoning is dizzying!

Democrats programmed the voting machines in big democrat precincts. Democrats counted the votes in big democrat precincts. Democrats illegally banned election observers from the counting process in big democrat precincts. And democrats refused to allow investigators access to the voting machines used in big democrat precincts. After all those shenanigans stupid or dishonest elections officials in key states like Georgia claimed they examined the voting machines and found nothing wrong.

Americans with good sense and morals are not buying that claim by people opposed to voting securities and voter fraud investigations.

 

[marke]

I doubt you understand the distinction you are trying to make here.

In Georgia an identification is required to verify registration of all who vote. Mail in ballots are examined for corresponding signature on the voter registration.

Biden said it well. It does not matter who votes. What matters is who counts the votes. Democrats scattered millions of ballots into the wind for their operatives to harvest and stuff into ballot boxes. Were the ballot signatures checked? Yes. Democrats verified every signature on every ballot for Biden no matter how clearly wrong it was, and then they did it again so they could tell rubes that the phony signatures were checked twice and confirmed genuine.

Putin could not have come up with a better plan to steal the election.

 

[marke]

The deadline established by the Constitution has passed. Trump is known to have the strategy to show false strength through legal action. Most of his legal actions lead to nothing. He sued Bill Maher for saying his mother was an orangutan. Legal action in the hopper seems impressive to his devotees who are not the brightest. Smarter folks recognize there is no merit to a claim long before the court's calendar catches up to the nonsense. Sixty out of Sixty-one of Trumps complaints about the election have been dismissed. Get real, Pal.

Precious few of the claims of voter fraud raised by millions of Americans have been proven wrong by democrats. Just because Al Capone was not convicted of murder due to 'lack of evidence' did not mean he was innocent and just because democrats have avoided widespread exposure of their widespread fraud does not mean they did not commit widespread voter fraud.

 

[marke]

Cos it has been, done and dusted and the farce might continue in certain areas but it doesn't alter anything. Them's the facts Kiwi..

Democrats still control the memory sticks on democrat voting machines which recorded miraculous numbers of votes for Biden, so nobody will be able to prove those machines were corrupted by democrats to steal the election.