See ! You can't read and understand !!!
ECT Follow Paul!
- Thread starter heir
- Start date
- Status
See ! You can't read and understand !!!
Still waiting for you to explain why Peter was accursed for allegedly preaching a different gospel to the Galatians?
Where does Peter and the 12 preach redemption through the blood of Christ ? Paul did -
Ephesians 1:7 KJV - Colossians 1:14 KJV -
or where did they preach that we are saved and sealed by believing and trusting ?
Ephesians 1:13 KJV -
Ephesians 1:7 KJV - Colossians 1:14 KJV -
or where did they preach that we are saved and sealed by believing and trusting ?
Ephesians 1:13 KJV -
John wrote a "book" called Revelation. Can one receive the gospel thru a book or does written language not work with the gospel?
Honestly man, if what you wrote here is right then why should anyone spread the Gospel? What point is there to evangelizing?
Yet another verse that destroys MAD:
(1 Cor 4:17 KJV) For this cause have I sent unto you Timotheus, who is my beloved son, and faithful in the Lord, who shall bring you into remembrance of my ways which be in Christ, as I teach every where in every church.
Compare what Paul says above to:
(1 Cor 4:17 KJV) For this cause have I sent unto you Timotheus, who is my beloved son, and faithful in the Lord, who shall bring you into remembrance of my ways which be in Christ, as I teach every where in every church.
Compare what Paul says above to:
LA I expect this to go nowhere, I'd bet my home on that being the case. But... read what Heir said, and see if you can pick out why I posted what I did, and then, respond rationally.
(1 Peter 2:24) “He himself bore our sins” in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; “by his wounds you have been healed.”
As we see above, Peter preached the same gospel that Paul did.
brewmama
New member
OK, lets take them each:
But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
Yes, yes, he got it by revelation, everyone knows that. And the Apostles got it personally from Jesus.
So? How do you get that they are different gospels from that quote?
But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace, 16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:
Yes, we know he was blind for 3 days, then "Ananias went to the house and entered it. Placing his hands on Saul, he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord—Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here—has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit.” 18 Immediately, something like scales fell from Saul’s eyes, and he could see again. He got up and was baptized, 19 and after taking some food, he regained his strength.
Saul in Damascus and Jerusalem
Saul spent several days with the disciples in Damascus. 20 At once he began to preach in the synagogues that Jesus is the Son of God. 21 All those who heard him were astonished and asked, “Isn’t he the man who raised havoc in Jerusalem among those who call on this name? And hasn’t he come here to take them as prisoners to the chief priests?” 22 Yet Saul grew more and more powerful and baffled the Jews living in Damascus by proving that Jesus is the Messiah
"Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days."
Now, how do you square that? Are you saying that he lied when he said he didn't confer with flesh and blood? That Luke lied in Acts? Or maybe that he suffered for a few days by himself, before he became established in the Church?
Somehow you read into that that he taught Peter. But it does not say that. Just what do you think that says?
And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.
Where does that verse say that their gospels differed? If he had run in vain, that sounds like he was referring to a possibility that they might not agree. But there is nothing to say that that happened.
Last edited:
It's useless talking to the blind, deaf and dumb
Peter wrote that after hearing from Paul.
It just all means that a believer who you regard as a heretic knows more truth than you do because you have received a spirit which has blinded your eyes.
LA
brewmama
New member
Does that just mean you can't answer the questions or explain yourself and your quotes?
So says the 70AD'er.
I'm sorry but, Catholics know nothing about the Grace Message for today.
Catholics are bound for judgment if they don't accept the truth in this life.
Your ignorance amazes me and annoys me at the same time. Why do
you think that is? You believe Christ already returned in 70AD. Proof
of your ignorance of the Scriptures.
LA knows less than all.
You meant to say: "As I see above."
Posters need to try and escape their false doctrines, misrepresentations, heresies,
misinterpretations and ignorance. They can start by reading/studying the writings
of the Apostle Paul. (Romans through Philemon) Paul speaks to us today in this
Dispensation of Grace. Both to the Jew and the gentile. We are saved by faith
through Grace.
misinterpretations and ignorance. They can start by reading/studying the writings
of the Apostle Paul. (Romans through Philemon) Paul speaks to us today in this
Dispensation of Grace. Both to the Jew and the gentile. We are saved by faith
through Grace.
As a Catholic, have you read the entire Bible? Word for word, cover to cover?
That's correct.
And Peter made it clear that Paul had written to them before Peter wrote to them.
You have Peter and Paul preaching different gospels.
That's not possible.
If they preached different gospels, than according to Paul, Peter should have been accursed.
- Status