Break down complex propositions into their elements and examine them independently.
The three types of binary thinking
Understand the three types of binary thinking, followed by three kinds of nuanced thinking that can be used to combat these tempting binary dichotomies.www.clearerthinking.org
www.webmd.com
I extremely think that twice two is four.Black and White Thinking
Black and white thinking is when someone thinks in extremes. Learn more about what it is, what causes it, and what you can do about it.
So my extreme belief that twice two is four will be transformed how?
Some people are smart enough to understand that life is more complicated than "twice two is four".
It's a whole bunch of "twice two is fours" all together. Nothing irrational or illogical or non-binary about it.
People aren't CPUs.
Language has been known since way before CPUs were a thing.
Irrelevant. People aren't strings of ones and zeros.
Even before acronyms
Correctamundo!Even before acronyms
That is irrelevant. Anything that can be said (by people) is divisible into distinct elemental propositions, and every single one of these is either true or false.
I'm sure you'd like to break people down to their constituent parts, people don't work that way.
People use language, and language does work that way.
People use language. People aren't language.
The only fool making that fool claim is you. Straw man.
What an idiot. The Supreme Court is our living code of ethics. America's founded upon a moral theory, expressed prosaically and rhetorically in our Declaration. The Constitution is the legal expression of that moral theory, version two (version one didn't work and the Constitution is the embodiment of the founders' understanding of both our moral theory and plus the lessons learned from version one). The Supreme Court has, in the Constitution, the power to review laws that the Legislative Branch makes, and because laws are judged according to the Constitution, and because the Constitution is a legal expression of a moral theory, the Supreme Court is our living code of ethics. In judging their constitutionality the Court also judges the morality of our nation's laws. If Washington made a code of ethics for the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court is going to have the power to review that law, to see if it comports with the Constitution, and that is what we literally pay these guys and gals to already be doing. The only way you can correct a problem in the Supreme Court is with impeachment, and nobody's saying impeachment because we all know how ridiculous impeaching Justice Thomas over this is.