Feminism

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skybringr

BANNED
Banned
When someone wishes to hold office or have someone who represents THEIR interests hold office, it's because those previously doing the job were not adequately representing them.

That would be the men. Why would men purposely set out to elevate men instead of representing women?

There's your misogyny.

You just gave a perfect example of why I am anti-feminist, because what you just said is a load of nonsense, and feminism fills your head with it :chuckle:
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
Well let's define first where feminism began.
I asked you why women wouldn't want to be treated as women. It's a simple question but I can understand why the answer would make you uncomfortable.

Fundamentally, it was where women wanted the right to vote and be in electoral offices, otherwise known as the women's suffrage movement.

This was not a movement pertaining to misogyny.
Depends on the definition you use. Hatred? Likely not. An ingrained prejudice against? Absolutely. When men think it reasonable to suggest women are incapable of the rational discernment that would make their vote informed that's evidence in support of the argument using misogyny as the root.

Else, why disenfranchise them? What justification is there?

Women wanted to participate in political dealings, and this was largely something of unmarried or otherwise independent women.
Citation? That would be unlikely given the times, though "otherwise independent women" seems a rather large loophole. And, following the passage of the 19th amendment eight million women turned out to vote, even as 12 states had yet to ratify. That rather plainly speaks against your attempt to narrow the complaint.
 

Skybringr

BANNED
Banned
Depends on the definition you use. Hatred? Likely not. An ingrained prejudice against? Absolutely. When men think it reasonable to suggest women are incapable of the rational discernment that would make their vote informed that's evidence in support of the argument using misogyny as the root.

Else, why disenfranchise them? What justification is there?

They were never enfranchised to begin with. Christian society never dictated that women be collectively involved in politics.
Even minorities were given the right to do so before women.

Citation? That would be unlikely given the times, though "otherwise independent women" seems a rather large loophole. And, following the passage of the 19th amendment eight million women turned out to vote, even as 12 states had yet to ratify. That rather plainly speaks against your attempt to narrow the complaint.

8 million women, relatively speaking, is not a lot.
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
They were never enfranchised to begin with.
They were foundationally. I know they couldn't vote before. It's sort of the point of attempting to gain the vote. :rolleyes:

Christian society never dictated that women be collectively involved in politics.
Which is a really odd way of saying they were denied the vote, as they had previously been denied property rights.

8 million women, relatively speaking, is not a lot.
How many women were eligible to vote in immediately following the 19th Amendment? I'll wait while the new found significance of that eight million sinks in.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Feminism didn't start because of misogyny, feminism started because women didn't want to be treated like women :rolleyes:
And that says a lot about new age feminists, which is void of any accountability- which you just encouraged. Good job.
Maybe one day you all will crawl out of your delusions and understand these things.

You mean treat like second class citizens denied the vote and any sort of voice? To pretty much put up and shut up no matter what abuse might occur? Yeah, I mean, who wouldn't want to be 'treat' like that?

:rolleyes:
 

Skybringr

BANNED
Banned
You mean treat like second class citizens denied the vote and any sort of voice? To pretty much put up and shut up no matter what abuse might occur? Yeah, I mean, who wouldn't want to be 'treat' like that?

:rolleyes:

There's a reason why the entirety of human history resembled a patriarch, and it wasn't because men hated women.

You all have just deluded yourselves with your feminism. If men have to think like women to be respected in society, it's not a society worth respecting. You're all slaves to women and don't even know it, just like an atheist doesn't know he's a slave to sin.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
There's a reason why the entirety of human history resembled a patriarch, and it wasn't because men hated women.

You all have just deluded yourselves with your feminism. If men have to think like women to be respected in society, it's not a society worth respecting. You're all slaves to women and don't even know it, just like an atheist doesn't know he's a slave to sin.

Noooo, it was because they always had their best interests at heart and disallowing them any sort of voice/vote was purely for the good of society as a whole eh? After all, why would a woman want to do anything other than do the chores and have any good reason to deny her patriarchal betrothed sex at any given time? And if he did insist on it then just how uppity would she be to say no?

You're quite right Skyfall. It's about time women just knew their limits and allowed men to grow four foot beards in peace...:

 

Skybringr

BANNED
Banned
Noooo, it was because they always had their best interests at heart and disallowing them any sort of voice/vote was purely for the good of society as a whole eh? After all, why would a woman want to do anything other than do the chores and have any good reason to deny her patriarchal betrothed sex at any given time? And if he did insist on it then just how uppity would she be to say no?

You're quite right Skyfall. It's about time women just knew their limits and allowed men to grow four foot beards in peace...:

A woman can either be a man or a woman, they cannot be both.
 

Skybringr

BANNED
Banned
It's very simple, one can either be a ~man~ or they can be a ~woman~.

See, a woman and her roles are clearly defined by the entirety of human history.
It's not superficial like racism or aristocracy, it's fundamental and universal.

Emancipated women today do not want to be women, but they don't want to be men either.
What they want, are equal results and standing of men, but still have the prospects and luxuries of being women.

Feminism in and of itself is unnatural. That's why it comes with all the outrageous things it comes with-
the divorce and infidelity rate among an intelligent, sentient species should not be in the ballpark of animals, but ever since feminism, we're comparable to rabbits and penguins in that respect.
Feminism gave birth to the LGBT movement, it has left men alone with their decimated castles-
It has caused society to outright lose it's damn mind.


Therefore, as far as I'm concerned, the only remedy to any and all these things is to give women a choice: be a man, or be a woman :wave:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
It's very simple, one can either be a ~man~ or they can be a ~woman~.

See, a woman and her roles are clearly defined by the entirety of human history.
It's not superficial like racism or aristocracy, it's fundamental and universal.

Emancipated women today do not want to be women, but they don't want to be men either.
What they want, are equal results and standing of men, but still have the prospects and luxuries of being women.

Feminism in and of itself is unnatural. That's why it comes with all the outrageous things it comes with-
the divorce and infidelity rate among an intelligent, sentient species should not be in the ballpark of animals, but ever since feminism, we're comparable to rabbits and penguins in that respect.
Feminism gave birth to the LGBT movement, it has left men alone with their decimated castles-
It has caused society to outright lose it's damn mind.


Therefore, as far as I'm concerned, the only remedy to any and all these things is to give women a choice: be a man, or be a woman :wave:

Hmm, so you'd actually give women a choice after all then? Oh, but only insofar as they'd behave as you consider a woman ought to act...

Crank.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Feminism didn't start because of misogyny, feminism started because women didn't want to be treated like women :rolleyes:

Not wanting to be treated like a woman:

physical-abuse-relationships.jpg
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
It's very simple, one can either be a ~man~ or they can be a ~woman~.

See, a woman and her roles are clearly defined by the entirety of human history.
Like slaves then.

It's not superficial like racism or aristocracy, it's fundamental and universal.
So you aren't a student of history either.

Emancipated women today do not want to be women, but they don't want to be men either.
Or, gender isn't the problem, the problem is empowered, narrow minded individuals who want to confuse historically imposed limitations by a mostly misogynistic ruling gender with the preordained and holy. :rolleyes:

What they want, are equal results and standing of men, but still have the prospects and luxuries of being women.
Translation: they want to retain their gender while having the opportunities that should be available to anyone with the ability and desire.

Feminism in and of itself is unnatural.
So it's like the polio vaccine then and not like, you know, polio.

That's why it comes with all the outrageous things it comes with- the divorce and infidelity rate among an intelligent, sentient species should not be in the ballpark of animals,
Divorce is mostly fueled by either financial woes or marital infidelity. Women have, historically, overwhelmingly been the moving party and men have, historically, been the party adjudicated as being in the wrong.

Feminism gave birth to the LGBT movement, it has left men alone with their decimated castles- It has caused society to outright lose it's damn mind.
I can't wait to see how you blame women for climate change. :plain:
 

Skybringr

BANNED
Banned
Mankind was better off a patriarch then whatever sorry excuse it is now.

There was a time when people took accountability, but now it only applies to white men and men are too busy putting sole interest in how many ways they can worship women without actually getting on their knees and kissing their heel.

There was a time when society would actually have to go down, despite their best effort, by another force.
But since feminism, we now have the luxury of not even having the damn choice, we just go down!
Because that's what happens when your fundamental interest is spoken in liberal/feminist philosophy and women are usurping what men do.

I'm sorry for being demonstrably correct :idunno:
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Mankind was better off a patriarch then whatever sorry excuse it is now.

There was a time when people took accountability, but now it only applies to white men and men are too busy putting sole interest in how many ways they can worship women without actually getting on their knees and kissing their heel.

There was a time when society would actually have to go down, despite their best effort, by another force.
But since feminism, we now have the luxury of not even having the damn choice, we just go down!
Because that's what happens when your fundamental interest is spoken in liberal/feminist philosophy and women are usurping what men do.

I'm sorry for being demonstrably correct :idunno:

Take control of your manhood and remain single, youll be doing all of us a favor.
 

Rusha

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Mankind was better off a patriarch then whatever sorry excuse it is now.

:chuckle: That's cute ... oh wait, you are serious.

There was a time when people took accountability, but now it only applies to white men and men are too busy putting sole interest in how many ways they can worship women without actually getting on their knees and kissing their heel.

There was a time when society would actually have to go down, despite their best effort, by another force.
But since feminism, we now have the luxury of not even having the damn choice, we just go down!

Oh. That's too bad. There are still countries who devalue women and treat them as property. When will you be moving out of the country and back into the Dark Ages?
 

Skybringr

BANNED
Banned
why is she sitting on the floor when there's chores to be done?

I don't know, but if he punches her then that floor will be hers, as well as the rest of the house, and the kids, and while he's in jail, she'll be emptying the bank account!

~Justice, because one's life should be utterly ruined for actually treating these apparent demigods among us as men~
#'equality' is a joke
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top