You already posted what she said that women shouldn't vote. Yet she does, if i didn't think women should do something, then i wouldnt do it.
If she thinks they shouldn't vote, and she does it anyway, shes a hypocrite any way you slice it.
Feminism
- Thread starter The 5 solas
- Start date
- Status
You already posted what she said that women shouldn't vote. Yet she does, if i didn't think women should do something, then i wouldnt do it.
If she thinks they shouldn't vote, and she does it anyway, shes a hypocrite any way you slice it.
zippy2006
New member
No I didn't, and no she didn't. But your reading comprehension is abysmal, so why am I still trying to have a conversation with you? :think:
Beats me why you are, since most people know that saying something is wrong then doing it anyway, means one is a hypocrite.
Maybe you dont know what hypocrite means or you have an alternative motive for your sad defense of something indefensible - even a child can see the hypocrisy in what she said then admits doing.
You can go now
zippy2006
New member
Would you say it's wrong to shoot human beings with lethal weapons? Would doing so to protect your family make you a hypocrite?
Would you say it's wrong to wipe out large numbers of animals by poisoning them? Would doing so to rid your house of ants, bees, or other pests make you a hypocrite?
Would you say it's wrong to cut open someone's head and cut into their brain? Would doing so for the purpose of brain surgery make you a hypocrite?
Again, you're just being intentionally difficult in order to paint Nang in a bad light. You don't wish to understand, you only wish to accuse. Feel free to look up W.D. Ross' ethical system known as Presumptivism or the theory of prima facie duties.
Im sorry, i could have sword you were lamenting speaking with me, why are you still doing it? Are you a hypocrite like nang too?
zippy2006
New member
I am. You act like a child. You don't wish to have conversation, you only wish to condemn. Do you know the etymology of "Satan"?
To ensure that the insufficiency of your claim is well-known.
There you go again. :yawn:
Let me know when you are finished deciding why you are still trying to have a conversation with me, you're kind of slow deciding the matter.
Maybe thats why you dont know what "hypocrite" means. :think:
BTW yes you can have the last word :angel:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
So, if you strongly object to a movement that brought about your right to actually have a say, and the right to express yourself that you utilize down the line that's in no way hypocritical is it?
Yeah okay zips. I'm sure there's some deeply profound philosophical argument that would support that notion...
lain:
zippy2006
New member
Brilliant! You "got me"! Just like you "got Nang." Congratulations. :second: Are you fulfilled now?
No need to engage in rational communication. No need to present something reasonable, to try to actually understand what someone is trying to say. All you have to do is walk around searching for the opportunity to say, "Gotcha!" It reminds me of the teenager who walks around doing nothing but rebelling and pointing out how stupid everyone and everything is. Yet they presumably grow up at some point.
zippy2006
New member
Cruciform has now been cloned.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, they weren't answered, because to answer the topic would have required some objective and prudent thought instead of this crap. Nang maintains that feminism came about through a primarily sexual source for liberation. Not the case. Secondly, justifying such rights in the present and taking advantage of them, while erroneously castigating those who actually fought for women to have a voice is what if not hypocrisy?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The irony is you won't even realize just how much you've described yourself...at least until a few years time maybe when hopefully your hang ups and issues have subsided somewhat.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Illogical.
Just because I believe feminism is wicked, means I must be silent and voice no opinions?
Bah
glorydaz
Well-known member
And you would be right. I was there during the early movement and sex had nothing to do with it. Some people just see sex wherever they look. It's such a big part of their mind-set.
The feminist movement started because women were treated like second class citizens....slaves in many cases....not even allowed to voice their opinion without being told to "Get back in the kitchen." Like most other movements, it went too far. Nothing new there.
glorydaz
Well-known member
In your case, it would be a good idea. :chuckle:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What's illogical is your bizarre notion that those who fought for a voice for women to start with were lesbians, or 'predominantly so', and then bang on about how such is 'wicked' even though the suffragette movement provided you with a voice which in times past you wouldn't have even had.
:doh:
And, isn't it interesting that; it takes 6 grown men to carry
a man to his grave however, it only takes one woman, to
put him there?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
So there would be no Internet nor TOL if it weren't for the feminist Suffrage movement?
That is humorous . . . :chuckle:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
It's only ignoramuses or misogynistic patriarch farts that would bemoan women having the right to have an equal voice and rights quite frankly. Some seem to see sex or militant attitudes any time the subject is even brought up...
- Status