FBI reopens email case on Crooked Hillary

[patrick jane]

The FBI finished reading Hillary's e-mail and could not find anything to use against her. So now what?

Prison

 

[rexlunae]

The FBI finished reading Hillary's e-mail and could not find anything to use against her. So now what?

Prison

Bill Maher recently observed that fascists decide that you're a criminal, and then they find the crime.

 

[Crucible]

The rest of the world hates Hillary because she's a crook, and her sidekick Abedin is Islam's Trojan horse. Liberals in America are just plain foolish- they fought for that by harassing and striving against everyone else

 

[rexlunae]

The rest of the world hates Hillary because she's a crook, and her sidekick Abedin is Islam's Trojan horse. Liberals in America are just plain foolish- they fought for that by harassing and striving against everyone else

As someone who's been to part of the rest of the world, I'll tell you that that's not true. Trump makes a lot of people nervous in other parts of the world.

 

[patrick jane]

I wonder what Britain thinks about the election -

 

[Crucible]

As someone who's been to part of the rest of the world, I'll tell you that that's not true. Trump makes a lot of people nervous in other parts of the world.

Doesn't change the fact that the world will hate America if Hillary is President. So, it is true- you just want to be dumb about it.

 

[rexlunae]

I wonder what Britain thinks about the election -

Those that I've talked to are pretty nervous about it, for what that's worth. It hasn't gone missed that Nigel Farage spoke at a Trump event.

Of course, the people I'm likely to talk to are also those who were unlikely to vote for Brexit. So there's that.

 

[rexlunae]

Doesn't change the fact that the world will hate America if Hillary is President. So, it is true- you just want to be dumb about it.

People like you are the reason people distrust the US. That you can suggest, in seriousness, for instance, that Huma Abedin, a Muslim woman who married a Jewish man and works for a Methodist woman, is some sort of "Islam[ic] Trojan Horse" is just a racist discursive, but you throw it around casually like it's a fact.

 

[Crucible]

That you can suggest, in seriousness, for instance, that Huma Abedin, a Muslim woman who married a Jewish man and works for a Methodist woman, is some sort of "Islam[ic] Trojan Horse" is just a racist discursive, but you throw it around casually like it's a fact.

Abedin is very secretive, and has dubious ties. You'd be perfectly fine with someone digging into her if she was a white Christian, but because she's not, it's 'racist'.
What a grand display of liberal bullcrap, bravo.

Nothing you have listed about her is significant. Many corrupt people claim Christianity, and Islam hardly even sees most here as Christians- they see people over here as straight up reprobates. And Hillary? ~LOL~
I don't expect lib to be honest about what they think a Muslim across seas actually sees her as. Secondly, Huma is married to a moronic, yet successful politician with a Jewish name, which she didn't take. It's called opportunity.

There's plenty of reason to wonder about her when you include her ties to the Middle East which are frankly suspicious in general. People like you just wait for anyone to scrutinize these people so you can pull out your 'bigot' lip service. It worked for a while, now people are becoming desensitized to it- why don't you just save yourself the trouble and come back to reality now instead of throwing yourself up on a cross when you're kicked back in it later

 

[rexlunae]

Abedin is very secretive, and has dubious ties.

She's not a public figure or a politician. So? I think a lot of politicians have high-level advisers that try to stay out of the spotlight. You cast it as suspicious...for some reason.

You'd be perfectly fine with someone digging into her if she was a white Christian, but because she's not, it's 'racist'.
What a grand display of liberal bullcrap, bravo.

I'd be perfectly fine with it if you dug into her on grounds that aren't explicitly bigoted. The only concrete thing you've given to justify your suspicion of her is her religion.

Nothing you have listed about her is significant.

Oh, ok. Can you name a Muslim extremist who has such close relations with people of other faiths?

Many corrupt people claim Christianity, and Islam hardly even sees most people here as Christians- they see people over here as straight up reprobates.

And so? Spit it out. What are you saying?

Secondly, married to a moron with a Jewish name, which she didn't take.

Didn't say he wasn't a moron, just said that he's Jewish. Which he totally is. It would certainly be a strange marriage for some sort of fundamentalist to be in.

There's plenty of reason to wonder about her when you include her when you include her ties to the Middle East which are frankly dubious at best. People like you just wait for anyone to scrutinize these people so you can pull out your 'bigot' lip service. It worked for a while, now people are becoming desensitized to it- why don't you just save yourself to trouble and come back to reality now instead of throwing yourself up on a cross when you're kicked back in it later

Well, when you think of one, other than just pointing at her religion and her origins, let me know. I'm not gonna hold my breath.

 

[Crucible]

I think a lot of politicians have high-level advisers that try to stay out of the spotlight.

So :idunno:
Is that supposed to be a point?

She's a Muslim with an investment in Islamist agendas in the Middle East, and has been Hillary's top advisor since she eyed the presidency many years ago.

It is not 'bigoted' to be suspicious of that- you've already used the words 'bigoted' and 'racist' in your two paragraphs worth of speaking.

You're a perfect reminder of why conservatives need to take back the White House. The irony of professional slanderers calling everyone bigots lost any amusement it once gave a long time ago.

 

[fool]

People like you are the reason people distrust the US. That you can suggest, in seriousness, for instance, that Huma Abedin, a Muslim woman who married a Jewish man and works for a Methodist woman, is some sort of "Islam[ic] Trojan Horse" is just a racist discursive, but you throw it around casually like it's a fact.

But, isn't that exactly what a Trojan Horse would do?
Have you looked into her parents?
I don't think Huma is a plant but the people who suggest that she is have good reasons.

 

[fool]

As someone who's been to part of the rest of the world, I'll tell you that that's not true. Trump makes a lot of people nervous in other parts of the world.

That's exactly what I wanted.

 

[rexlunae]

I don't think Huma is a plant but the people who suggest that she is have good reasons.

Name one.

 

[rexlunae]

So :idunno:
Is that supposed to be a point?

It's supposed to be an opportunity for you to respond by providing the rationale that isn't based on her race or her religion.

She's a Muslim with an investment in Islamist agendas in the Middle East, and has been Hillary's top advisor since she eyed the presidency many years ago.

Specifically, what investment?

It is not 'bigoted' to be suspicious of that- you've already used the words 'bigoted' and 'racist' in your two paragraphs worth of speaking.

It's bigoted to be unable to explain why you are suspicious.

You're a perfect reminder of why conservatives need to take back the White House. The irony of professional slanderers calling everyone bigots lost any amusement it once gave a long time ago.

You think I'm getting paid for this?

 

[rexlunae]

That's exactly what I wanted.

Why?

 

[fool]

Didn't say he wasn't a moron, just said that he's Jewish. Which he totally is. It would certainly be a strange marriage for some sort of fundamentalist to be in.

But exactly what you'd expect from a Trojan Horse!

Well, when you think of one, other than just pointing at her religion and her origins, let me know. I'm not gonna hold my breath.

Her Education.
She was born in the States but grew up in Saudi Arabia.
This is not Huma from the block.
She comes back to go to Georgetown and gets an internship to the White House as an aid to Hillary and stuck to her like glue for 20 years.
Huma knows everything Hillary knows and sees everything she sees.

 

[rexlunae]

But exactly what you'd expect from a Trojan Horse!

So she's the kind of super stealthy Trojan Horse that never does anything out of line to suggest their ulterior agenda?

Well, that's commitment. It's also completely impossible to prove.

Her Education.
She was born in the States but grew up in Saudi Arabia.

Ah, so her parents are in on the plot. That's devious.

This is not Huma from the block.

Huh?

She comes back to go to Georgetown and gets an internship to the White House as an aid to Hillary and stuck to her like glue for 20 years.
Huma knows everything Hillary knows and sees everything she sees.

So what are you saying? Huma 2024?

 

[ok doser]

... a Muslim woman who married a Jewish man and works for a Methodist woman, is some sort of "Islam[ic] Trojan Horse" is just a racist discursive...

:think:


what race is muslim? or Jew? or Methodist? or trojan?

So she's the kind of super stealthy Trojan Horse that never does anything out of line to suggest their ulterior agenda?

ever seen The Manchurian Candidate?

 

[patrick jane]

I saw this on infowars




WHAT ALL AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON’S ALLEGED SAP COMPROMISE--MAJ ED COET, USA (RET)

[COURTESY: CAPT Les Horn, USN (Ret)]

My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany. In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news. Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:

1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.

2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.

3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.

4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.

5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.

6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA. Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.

7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.

As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could -- but without doubt would -- cause serious damage to our national security.

If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.

If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.

If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government. If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is true to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.

If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA -- and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “dis qualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information - period.

ED COET

Major, US Army (Retired).

Shocking :shocked: