Comey doesn't report to Congress, ordinarily. Congress can subpoena him, or they can ask him for information. Taking the step of writing to Congress is unorthodox, and it should not be done without some kind of actual relevant information. He should have conducted his investigation, and released a statement when they have something to show for it, if ever.
FBI reopens email case on Crooked Hillary
- Thread starter jeffblue101
- Start date
Comey doesn't report to Congress, ordinarily. Congress can subpoena him, or they can ask him for information. Taking the step of writing to Congress is unorthodox, and it should not be done without some kind of actual relevant information. He should have conducted his investigation, and released a statement when they have something to show for it, if ever.
jeffblue101
New member
transparency is not what you want? this is why i'm heavily leaning towards voting for trump, liberals, like yourself will never hold Hillary accountable for anything that she does.
CherubRam
New member
The FBI has not had time to examine to know what is what, and no body cares about Hillary's political gossip.
Hillary Clinton broke the law dozens of times over and over - she can't be president Vote Trump !!!
View attachment 24933
click to enlarge
Not in the middle of a criminal investigation. I expect that the investigators will keep their work secret until they have something to announce, both in general but especially when it risks entanglement in politics.
Comey's announcement only makes that more difficult. You're right that I don't think what's been found amounts to much, but what I can say for certain is that the law requires unelected executive branch officials to stay out of politics. Comey seems to have forgotten that.
CherubRam
New member
Prove it!
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
comey seems determined to let the voters know what disgusting scumbags the clintons are :darwinsm:
| Washington (AFP) - The FBI has unexpectedly released documents concerning ex-president Bill Clinton's pardon of the husband of a wealthy Democratic donor, in a surprise move just days before the election in which his wife is seeking to become America's first female president. |
jeffblue101
New member
given Comey's interpretation of the law, she would have to admit to having malicious intent to be indicted.
It would seem.
Indeed. http://warontherocks.com/2016/07/why-intent-not-gross-negligence-is-the-standard-in-clinton-case/
And in what I hope is the last October surprise, no new charges will result from the FBI's recent review and venture in to politics:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/11/fbi-comey-clinton-emails
Please don't vote for Orange Hitler.
Interesting notion. So, if you like the direction the country is headed, vote Clinton. If you don't, vote Trump.
I think I'm reasonably ok with that.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...r-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials.html
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/
So, Clinton had her maid print out her e-mails for her at her house, e-mails containing classified material.
Her house in DC was called Whitehaven.
Are you people seeing this?
She had e-mails forwarded to her maids e-mail so her maid could print them.
And the FBI is not in possession of that computer.
So, I would go ahead and get used to this. The Comey letters.
Every time he finds another device that has e-mails that came from her server that she was "extremely careless with classified information" on he has to tell Congress about it. Because he testified under oath in front of them about it.
So it'll be a two week news cycle.
He finds another device. Sends a letter. Gets a warrant. Reads the mail. Reports back that it was just another device that had classified info that they already said she was careless with and no new classified e-mail that she was careless with but just copies of careless e-mail that they already knew about.
Every single time.
For every single device.
And people will want to blame Comey for not just getting over it already. She has apologized and admitted it was a mistake to spray classified information all over the web with a fire hose and it won't happen again.
Why can't he just shut up about every new breech if it's the same as the old breech?
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/
So, Clinton had her maid print out her e-mails for her at her house, e-mails containing classified material.
Her house in DC was called Whitehaven.
Are you people seeing this?
She had e-mails forwarded to her maids e-mail so her maid could print them.
And the FBI is not in possession of that computer.
So, I would go ahead and get used to this. The Comey letters.
Every time he finds another device that has e-mails that came from her server that she was "extremely careless with classified information" on he has to tell Congress about it. Because he testified under oath in front of them about it.
So it'll be a two week news cycle.
He finds another device. Sends a letter. Gets a warrant. Reads the mail. Reports back that it was just another device that had classified info that they already said she was careless with and no new classified e-mail that she was careless with but just copies of careless e-mail that they already knew about.
Every single time.
For every single device.
And people will want to blame Comey for not just getting over it already. She has apologized and admitted it was a mistake to spray classified information all over the web with a fire hose and it won't happen again.
Why can't he just shut up about every new breech if it's the same as the old breech?
Hellary For Prison