Facebook Muslims react to London terror with joy

[ok doser]

I like that - an objective rule that differs from annecdotal support for assumption based on bias.

That principle is the basis for many of my conclusions :thumb:

One would think those on here ever harping on and on that "things that differ are not the same" would subscribe to such a reliable principle.

Then again, they're all Trumpers.

Par for the course in the Trumper land of "alternate fact."

worth noting that not only did town fail to explain precisely and succinctly chuckle: ) how such an "objective rule" should be fashioned, but he never provides one himself



still, it was a masterful display of butchering the english language to further his goal of total obfuscation :thumb:

 

[Town Heretic]

Bluster and blow..... :rotfl:

No, it isn't. You just don't know how to meet it rationally so you do this in lieu of putting yourself in a position to be embarrassed by your presumption.

 

[ok doser]

and what does he respond with?

more bluster and blow :darwinsm:

 

[Town Heretic]

and what does he respond with?

more bluster and blow :darwinsm:

What's really funny is you did the same thing she did and for exactly the same reason.

 

[ClimateSanity]

No, it isn't. You just don't know how to meet it rationally so you do this in lieu of putting yourself in a position to be embarrassed by your presumption.

So. In lieu of. Putting. To be. By your...clause starts. Also, couldn't you have more clarity if he chose another verb besides "meet"?

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[ClimateSanity]

and what does he respond with?

more bluster and blow :darwinsm:

So. In lieu of. Putting. To be. By your...clause starts. Also, couldn't he have more clarity if he chose another verb besides "meet"?

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[ok doser]

So. In lieu of. Putting. To be. By your...clause starts. Also, couldn't he have more clarity if he chose another verb besides "meet"?

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

i was always taught that the purpose of language is to communicate, clearly

town, apparently, was taught otherwise

 

[glorydaz]

No, it isn't. You just don't know how to meet it rationally so you do this in lieu of putting yourself in a position to be embarrassed by your presumption.

Let's face it. There isn't a soul in existence as wise and intelligent as you are. I'm not sure how you manage to live on the same planet as the rest of us.

 

[ClimateSanity]

i was always taught that the purpose of language is to communicate, clearly

town, apparently, was taught otherwise

It's a force of habit I think. It's almost a separate language. It's lawyer speak. What I want to know is why everyone pretends like he is speaking clearly?

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[glorydaz]

What's really funny is you did the same thing she did and for exactly the same reason.

What's really funny is you keep doing the same thing even when it's pointed out to you. I can only assume you are totally pleased with yourself.

 

[ok doser]

It's a force of habit I think. It's almost a separate language. It's lawyer speak. What I want to know is why everyone pretends like he is speaking clearly?

they don't


everybody's laughing at him behind his back except for his sycophants


apparently their adoration is sufficient to feed his ego :idunno:

 

[Tambora]

And yet, you could not wait to get back quick enough the very moment you were given walking papers

Walking papers don't mean squat at TOL.
Just ask Doser.

 

[glorydaz]

It's a force of habit I think. It's almost a separate language. It's lawyer speak. What I want to know is why everyone pretends like he is speaking clearly?

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

I've known lawyers who were not high-minded and condescending, so I don't think he can use that as an excuse.

 

[ok doser]

Walking papers don't mean squat at TOL.
Just ask Doser.

:noid:

 

[annabenedetti]

they don't


everybody's laughing at him behind his back except for his sycophants

I sure wish a psychologist could do a case study on the way you follow TH around, so they could examine your behavior when it comes to him. It would be fascinating.

 

[ok doser]

I've know lawyers who were not high-minded and condescending, so I don't think he can use that as an excuse.

what's hilarious to me is that if you read court decisions (i especially like the dissents), they're clear and understandable

 

[ClimateSanity]

I've known lawyers who were not high-minded and condescending, so I don't think he can use that as an excuse.

My guess is that he has a circle of friends/ associates that are social clones of each other.

Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[ok doser]

oh look - here's one of his sycophants now:

I sure wish a psychologist could do a case study on the way you follow TH around, so they could examine your behavior when it comes to him. It would be fascinating.

:wave2:


where's your tardly little friend?

 

[annabenedetti]

So. In lieu of. Putting. To be. By your...clause starts. Also, couldn't he have more clarity if he chose another verb besides "meet"?

I have no idea what you just said.

It's almost a separate language.

Oh.

 

[Town Heretic]

I wrote: No, it isn't. You just don't know how to meet it rationally so you do this in lieu of putting yourself in a position to be embarrassed by your presumption.

So. In lieu of. Putting. To be. By your...clause starts. Also, couldn't you have more clarity if he chose another verb besides "meet"?

There's literally nothing wrong with the grammar and I dialed it down sufficiently so that the grade reading level required to understand it without any difficulty is around the senior year of high school (the fog index came in at 12.67, so a sharp, college ready senior then). But if you're having trouble all you have to do is say so and I'll happily break it into something more digestible for you.