Does Luke 19:44 disprove Preterism?

[Grosnick Marowbe]

It only appears to be parroting because anyone who understands the Bible literally will come to the same basic conclusions as Darby did, without ever hearing of the man named Darby.

On the other hand, those who read the Bible with an allegorical interpretation, need someone to inform them of which made-up symbolic meaning is to be imposed on the text.

Good post.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

It only appears to be parroting because anyone who understands the Bible literally will come to the same basic conclusions as Darby did, without ever hearing of the man named Darby.

I agree with that. There is no alternative.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Nobody agrees with poor old TeT. Looks as if he's left out in the cold?

 

[chrysostom]

Nobody agrees with poor old TeT. Looks as if he's left out in the cold?

tet does a good job of exposing mad for what it is

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

tet does a good job of exposing mad for what it is

Yet you are on opposite teams, because his gospel does not match yours.

 

[George Affleck]

That Darby fella invented what you believe.

I agree with you.

A lot of cult ideas were spawned around the mid-19th century.

 

[musterion]

It only appears to be parroting because anyone who understands the Bible literally will come to the same basic conclusions as Darby did, without ever hearing of the man named Darby.

On the other hand, those who read the Bible with an allegorical interpretation, need someone to inform them of which made-up symbolic meaning is to be imposed on the text.

POTY candidate righ' chere.

 

[chrysostom]

That Darby fella invented what you believe.

I agree with you.

A lot of cult ideas were spawned around the mid-19th century.

darby stuff is man made

 

[musterion]

Luke 19:44 disproves preterism.

lain:

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

darby stuff is man made

Is the brown scapular from God or man?

 

[tetelestai]

Yes, they were of this generation, and were vipers.

They were of the generation of Jesus' contemporaries.

Still have them today.

No one alive today was who Jesus was referring to when He used the phrase "this generation" throughout the gospels.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

They were of the generation of Jesus' contemporaries.



No one alive today was who Jesus was referring to when He used the phrase "this generation" throughout the gospels.

In looking at the big picture, I see my previous posts as a possibility.

 

[tetelestai]

It only appears to be parroting because anyone who understands the Bible literally will come to the same basic conclusions as Darby did, without ever hearing of the man named Darby.

Not true Darby.

No one taught that Jesus came back twice until Darby invented it.

On the other hand, those who read the Bible with an allegorical interpretation, need someone to inform them of which made-up symbolic meaning is to be imposed on the text.

The Pharisees did what you are doing.

It's why they didn't realize Jesus was who He said He was.

 

[musterion]

Is the brown scapular from God or man?

My hash browns at Waffle House once resembled St. Elutherius. I took it as a sign and considered the priesthood until my hotcakes arrived with a scorchmark like unto Madelyn Murray O'Hare. They kinda canceled each other out.

 

[tetelestai]

A lot of cult ideas were spawned around the mid-19th century.

Yep

Darby was a contemporary of Joseph Smith, Charles Taze Russell, Ellen White, and Mary Baker Eddy.

It's why that era is referred to as "the age of the cults".

Dispensationalism, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventism, and Christian Science were all invented during "the age of the cults".

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

It's why they didn't realize Jesus was who He said He was.

Maybe, maybe not.

John 11
47 Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees a council, and said, What do we? for this man doeth many miracles.

48 If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

My hash browns at Waffle House once resembled St. Elutherius. I took it as a sign and considered the priesthood until my hotcakes arrived with a scorchmark like unto Madelyn Murray O'Hare. They kinda canceled each other out.

One time I lost my Saint Anthony statute and had to pray to Saint Anthony to help me find it. Talk about irony...

 

[tetelestai]

Luke 19:44 disproves preterism.

lain:

Wrong again mysteryboy.

Luke 19:44 confirms Preterism, and at the same time proves your Dispensationalism wrong.

 

[tetelestai]

In looking at the big picture,

That's code for "making the Bible fit my Dispensationalism"

I see my previous posts as a possibility.

There is not one verse that supports your possibility, and many that prove it wrong.

 

[patrick jane]

That Darby fella invented what you believe.

Luis de Alcasar invented Preterism