nancy said:I already responded to it and dispelled it with ease, Yorkitz.
So I made a simpler question that was easier to understand. Here it is:Yorkitz, if what is why and when is where is how if?
The statement above makes as much sense as your post.
Every choice we make has causes. Every cause is known by God, therefore God knows all our choices.
Is that correct?
What does the Bible say about creation?Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:can you show me biblical support for God being subject to time? Ig God is subject to time, then Time is bigger thatn God, and we shouldnt be worshipping God but Time. But the Bible says all things and that means all things including time are subject to God. But you say differently, so i have to agree with you instead of the Bible.
No, you are the one bringing this up and claiming the illogical. It is your responsibility to back it up.Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:can you show me biblical support for God being subject to time?
Ig God is subject to time, then Time is bigger thatn God, and we shouldnt be worshipping God but Time. But the Bible says all things and that means all things including time are subject to God. But you say differently, so i have to agree with you instead of the Bible.
This "solution" skips the most logical view regarding the topic. Lets call this view number 4.intro2faith said:There are three views regarding children who die before the age of accountability, that is, before they are old enough to be morally responsible for their own actions.
Poly said:No, you are the one bringing this up and claiming the illogical. It is you're responsibility to back it up.
But that's just it. You have to prove that time is something that one would have to "subject" themselves to as if it were a constraining thing rather than a simple concept to express the the measure and passing of events, proceedings, occurances, etc.
You are referring to the measurement of time, not the concept of time.Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:Time in according to physicist is not just some mere abstract idea floating in our heads, it is something with physical properties - it is a dimension.
I disagree. There is no logical reason whatsoever to assume that God's word means something other than what is so plainly says.The Genesis account is allegory, but it does provide clues as to the nature of Creation, especially when god brings light into being, thats the foundation of matter. God doesn't need to be created because God is not a creature nor is God a thing.
Knight said:There is no logical reason whatsoever to assume that God's word means something other than what is so plainly says.
:bang:Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:If you really beleive that there is no allegory in God's word, or that we have to take everything that the Bible says literally then you have to accept that life is meaningless and a literal 10- headeddragon is going to pop out of the sea, tell us to worship it and put 666 on our heads.
A literal dragon.
I am not saying that it is causal, I'm saying that foreknowledge removes one's ability to do otherwise and therefore it destroys freedom because freedom is defined as being able to do or to do otherwise.nancy said:Clete, without going into the causal determinism, you haven't addressed the issue.
In terms of the chemical experiment, how is standing back and observing how the chemicals react CAUSING the chemical reaction itself.
Foreknowledge or observing an outcome is not causal.
I do not beleive that there will be no sadness in heaven. In fact the Bible seems to indicate the reverse. God will dry every tear, right? Why would that be necessary if there were no tears shed in heaven?fool said:how can we make this dovetail with the "no sadness in heaven" concept put forth by Intro2faith?
or does it not?
With that reasoning there is no reason to assume the part about 10 headed dragors is allegorical either, if God's word is be taken plainly.Knight said:There is simply no reason to assume that the creation account in Genesis is allegorical unless of course you are a nut-ball evolutionist.
Yeah, okay. Sounds good to me. I really think you are misunderstanding my position, or else I am misunderstanding yours.nancy said:Clete, God created us to have free will. In other words God CAUSED us to have free will. The fact that God caused us to have human freedom makes freedom free not unfree. Grace establishes nature rather than removing it.
You are right that free will is the the cause of its own movement. But what is free is not necesarily the cause of itself as neither for one thing to be the cause of another has to be the first cause.
Another Muslim? No?Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:With that reasoning there is no reason to assume the part about 10 headed dragors is allegorical either, if God's word is be taken plainly.
Freak said:Another Muslim? No?
Hasan_ibn_Sabah, is a unique name, where is it dervived from?Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:No, Orthodox Christian, not many of those around here.
Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:God doesn't need to know the future, nor does God need to plan things out.
God is not subject to time, only creatures who are subject to time find it necessary to make plans. God doesnt need to make plans because of the space/time continuim is subject to God, not the other way around.
Also, God doesn't have a plan for your life, your life is God's will.
Time is not a thing one is subject to. Why do people insist on talking about time as though it were something more than an idea. Time is duration and succestion. When you say that God is eternal you are not saying that He is timeless you are saying that He has not limitation on His duration, that He has an unlimited or eternal amount of time. It's just the exact opposite of being timeless.Hasan_ibn_Sabah said:So what you are saying is God is subject to time.