to be more clear, God is giving all of us opportunity to be in His kingdom for eternity through Jesus Christ.
to be even clearer -
-we have this opportunity because Jesus suffered and died for us
-do you agree to that?
to be more clear, God is giving all of us opportunity to be in His kingdom for eternity through Jesus Christ.
So do all heed his shed blood? (Hint: the answer is no.)
to be even clearer -
-we have this opportunity because Jesus suffered and died for us
-do you agree to that?
Now you are going to nitpicking.
Of course I do.
is it a problem for you to answer that over and over again?
it seems you are just trying to irritate me since you already know my answer..
I don't take to faith easily. Faith is based on evidence, I'd say. Acts 2:22.
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1.
And, yes, there is evidence. I recognise that.
It remains rather troubling that believers in Christ can't agree on the gospel - as the OP highlights.
I think the point is that Calvinism doesn't teach that Christ's death was for all men, but only the ones chosen.So Piper misspeaks in the video? 'Christ died for your sins' should not be preached to unbelievers?
I think the point is that Calvinism doesn't teach that Christ's death was for all men, but only the ones chosen.
So unless you specifically know that a person is one of the chosen, then you can't tell them Christ's death was for them.
It's as if a father had two children.
The father tells the children that if they do not eat supper, they will be punished.
The father then sets a plate of supper in front of one child to eat, but gives the other child nothing.
And then the father punishes the other for not eating supper.
Ok. But the point of the OP is whether Calvinists trip up on their own theology.
when His word is spread falsely I will not hesitate to correct it.
We have responsibility to spread the whole truth, not half gospel.
Christ died for all man's sins.
What if I don't obey him? I cheat, I do wrong.
By what standard?
Sorry, Mat 20:1-16.Mat 22?
1Cor 2:14 and etc. suggests otherwise. Again, although I'm a sovereign grace Christian I'm not a Calvinist, just offering a possible reason for why a Calvinist would preach as Piper did in the video. I don't see his preaching as necessarily violating Calvinist logic on the basis noted in previous posts. I'm not sure why a Calvinist has not stepped in to correct either of us, but there it is.But the so called non-elect not 'hearing' does not guard against them understanding what Piper is telling them - that Christ died for them - even though Piper believes that Christ did not die for all men.
Assuming you take the Arminian position I get your insistence on Piper's theological faux pas, I just don't see the same logical intrusion you do Sonnet.Surely he (Piper) is tripping over the awkwardness of his own mistaken theology? And we are talking about the very essence of the saving work of Christ - the essence of the good news.
There is only one standard. Talk about your all time idiot questions that they thought was a trap...
The problem is you don't know the whole truth.