annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Who planted the seed :idunno:
It's all 50/50, until of course when you don't like it!
Who let them? (Except of course, when they forced it on her.)
Who planted the seed :idunno:
It's all 50/50, until of course when you don't like it!
You're supposed to let the chicken give you the egg first.
Who planted the seed :idunno:
It's all 50/50, except when you don't like it! Men like Artie though- they got your back all the way from the sunrise to the furniture disappearing![]()
Who let them? (Except of course, when they forced it on her.)
If it's 50/50 then what's your problem with equality?
![]()
There you go with the notion that women have control over life and death :think:
And I'm supposedly the one that's screwed up :chuckle:
I think you all need to have a sit down and think hard about how your ideology turned into the nonsense you hold to on this subject.
Since nukes have not been used on anyone, there's really no way to tell how things will turn out.The OP is designed as an opportunity to explain just how nukes would work in eradicating Islam. If you can't actually answer how the use of nukes would achieve this goal then why would you even support such a "method"?
:liberals:
There's a difference between 'equality' and 'equity'.
Equality is forced- women are successful by privilege.
Equity is not forced- women can be as good as men, or not.
They aren't, so- 'equality'lain:
Just as soon as you give birth to a baby.
Since nukes have not been used on anyone, there's really no way to tell how things will turn out.
I don't think anyone knew exactly how well an A-bomb would work out before we used one and saw.
As awful as the A-bomb was, it ended a war.
I think you might be under the impression that I want to be fair about this and abide by rules of war.
I don't.
I want to be 100 times more brutal and ruthless than they are.
I want us to be so ruthless towards them that anything they have done will seem like a kiddie story in comparison.
Of course, the baby isn't even the father's until you decide to give birth, right? Then magically you can rob him for your well being, and keep him on his toes while the child grows up and probably ends up a delinquent.
Ahh..
~facts~
Since nukes have not been used on anyone, there's really no way to tell how things will turn out.
I don't think anyone knew exactly how well an A-bomb would work out before we used one and saw.
As awful as the A-bomb was, it ended a war.
I think you might be under the impression that I want to be fair about this and abide by rules of war.
I don't.
I want to be 100 times more brutal and ruthless than they are.
I want us to be so ruthless towards them that anything they have done will seem like a kiddie story in comparison.
So... tell me how you'd be better than a woman at giving birth.
I'll wait.
Alright, women are better at giving birth.
Anything else?
How good are you at breastfeeding an infant?
We have the expression "fight fire with fire" because fighting fire with fire works.You don't do evil that good* may come of it. That's scriptural.
*"Good," in this instance, would be the supposed idea that such a strike would eradicate Islam. It wouldn't.
You don't do evil that good* may come of it. That's scriptural.
*"Good," in this instance, would be the supposed idea that such a strike would eradicate Islam. It wouldn't.
We have the expression "fight fire with fire" because fighting fire with fire works.
We have the expression "fight fire with fire" because fighting fire with fire works.