excuse me for butting in but why do NASA lie?
Conspiracy - Are Some Theories Accurate?
- Thread starter patrick jane
- Start date
There are many possible reasons. I don't recommend going down the conspiracy rabbit hole. It's not cool. It's very worldly. It makes you suspicious of others and paranoid sometimes. Do so at your own risk, if you have a computer you can do some research on anything you want.
There are many possible reasons. I don't recommend going down the conspiracy rabbit hole. It's not cool. It's very worldly. It makes you suspicious of others and paranoid sometimes. Do so at your own risk, if you have a computer you can do some research on anything you want.
I have no reason to believe NASA lie.
sorry.
FakeX Space Excrement
From the video description: There was a huge glitch during SpaceX's launch of their "Star Man Roadster" car, proving once again they are using CGI tricks and not "live" during their supposed live recordings. To see many more examples of NASA, SpaceX and other space fakery please visit IFERS:
https://youtu.be/dm7S8aXQJ4I - Only 2 minutes - best one I've seen yet if it's real footage
Click on link to ensure full screen view - a phone works fine though. If the link isn't there, copy/paste in a new tab
If this footage is real and true, it's very concerning to me. What say you? I don't know if I can believe this or if this fake too.
From the video description: There was a huge glitch during SpaceX's launch of their "Star Man Roadster" car, proving once again they are using CGI tricks and not "live" during their supposed live recordings. To see many more examples of NASA, SpaceX and other space fakery please visit IFERS:
https://youtu.be/dm7S8aXQJ4I - Only 2 minutes - best one I've seen yet if it's real footage
Click on link to ensure full screen view - a phone works fine though. If the link isn't there, copy/paste in a new tab
If this footage is real and true, it's very concerning to me. What say you? I don't know if I can believe this or if this fake too.
WizardofOz
New member
:liberals:
If the ship disappears while you're on it then you've really got problems.
Last edited:
Right Divider
Body part
[MENTION=16629]patrick jane[/MENTION]
It's simply stunning how gullible you are.
View attachment 26167
This diagram accurately expresses the flat earth model of the sun at its farthest point away from an observer.
The sun is STILL above the horizon 9 degrees. It is also only ~19,000 miles away.
If the flat earth model were true, the sun would easily be visible ALL NIGHT LONG using a telescope.
Therefore, the flat earth model is EASILY shown to be FALSE.
P.S. Their simulation that shows a flashlight sun beam is hilarious.
It's simply stunning how gullible you are.
View attachment 26167
This diagram accurately expresses the flat earth model of the sun at its farthest point away from an observer.
The sun is STILL above the horizon 9 degrees. It is also only ~19,000 miles away.
If the flat earth model were true, the sun would easily be visible ALL NIGHT LONG using a telescope.
Therefore, the flat earth model is EASILY shown to be FALSE.
P.S. Their simulation that shows a flashlight sun beam is hilarious.
:think:
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/06/south-pole-does-not-exist.html
Nope the circumference is not 24,000 miles.
Not only that I got my Christmas present at 14 years old.
It was a telescope that was supposed to show me all that stuff.
Guess what?
It didn't.
Last edited:
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
There are many possible reasons. I don't recommend going down the conspiracy rabbit hole. It's not cool. It's very worldly. It makes you suspicious of others and paranoid sometimes. Do so at your own risk, if you have a computer you can do some research on anything you want.
Yet truth is truth.
I know for a fact that some of the theories are true. every good conspiracy theory has truth. I just wasn't about to try explaining nasa to meshak :chuckle:
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Wouldn't the shore disappear from sight of the ship?
You do make it hard to be gentle with you.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
BTW , RD, telescopes don't do what you think they do.
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/592890-how-far-can-you-see/page-2
How far can you see?
I've always found that question interesting. After a lifetime of using optical instruments and being an amateur astronomer, I know it's a fundamentally misguided question, but it can be hard to explain why.
There's a conception of "vision" as something that *comes from our eyes* - to put it a little crudely, that "rays" come out of our eyes and whatever they touch, we can see. Now, no one would explicitly say that's how vision works, but it can be pretty clear that, perhaps unconsciously, that's the model that some people are working from. (Well, hardly anyone would describe it that way...In fact it pretty much *is* the model explicitly described by a number of pre-scientific sources).
But quite a few people very much believe that vision has a hard limit we can't see past, no matter what, and that optical instruments extend that range of distance (rather than changing the apparent size/brightness of things in the visual field).
The fact of the matter is we don't "see" at a distance *at all*. We only see what's on our retinas, in our eye (and telescopes with cameras only "see" what hits their detectors, etc.). Distance isn't really a direct factor in what we see, because the light travels *to us*, our vision doesn't travel to the object.
I haven't really tried that explanation on an unsuspecting member of the public yet. I don't think it would go well, to be honest.
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/592890-how-far-can-you-see/page-2
How far can you see?
I've always found that question interesting. After a lifetime of using optical instruments and being an amateur astronomer, I know it's a fundamentally misguided question, but it can be hard to explain why.
There's a conception of "vision" as something that *comes from our eyes* - to put it a little crudely, that "rays" come out of our eyes and whatever they touch, we can see. Now, no one would explicitly say that's how vision works, but it can be pretty clear that, perhaps unconsciously, that's the model that some people are working from. (Well, hardly anyone would describe it that way...In fact it pretty much *is* the model explicitly described by a number of pre-scientific sources).
But quite a few people very much believe that vision has a hard limit we can't see past, no matter what, and that optical instruments extend that range of distance (rather than changing the apparent size/brightness of things in the visual field).
The fact of the matter is we don't "see" at a distance *at all*. We only see what's on our retinas, in our eye (and telescopes with cameras only "see" what hits their detectors, etc.). Distance isn't really a direct factor in what we see, because the light travels *to us*, our vision doesn't travel to the object.
I haven't really tried that explanation on an unsuspecting member of the public yet. I don't think it would go well, to be honest.
Another possible depiction of a flat earth. The north pole would be at the center of unfrozen land masses on earth. Check into the Antarctica treaty and how many agencies and institutions began at that time. What did they learn about the "planet"?
Last edited:
The Tesla Roadster Should Be Melting... [SPACE IS FAKE]
https://youtu.be/FIjNzHDFHpA - 9 minutes - New -
Cars would melt in space. Regular paint and materials, so fake it's not even funny.
https://youtu.be/FIjNzHDFHpA - 9 minutes - New -
Cars would melt in space. Regular paint and materials, so fake it's not even funny.
Last edited:
Flat Earth crap is stupidity, as I (and others) spent months on another thread proving beyond all doubt.
Glad you're 100% sure, maybe I will be someday, sorry to bother you. I thought you were researching the electric universe crap on Thunder Bolt Project or something. Was that proven wrong beyond all doubt too?
Last edited: