chrysostom’s 2013 annual awards

rainee

New member
You're insufferable! Do you ever write a post without that?

You do realise not every insult is an ad hominem, or... do you?


375px-Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement1.svg.png



P.s. You're an idiot.

2 Ti 1:7 < What has that got to do with you being crazy? You can't say that God has given everyone a sound mind.

?

Didn't you just call SD insulting names?

Are you saying calling SD insulting names is somehow not trying to make points against the person?

Was the pyramid supposed to make your argument better or just SD's?
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
The argument isn't over restricting, but over abolishing,

this is not true

I will accept anything that restricts abortion
and
I have said in the past that I do not see judges overturning roe
but
I do see judges allowing many consecutive laws restricting abortion that will eventually make roe meaningless
 

Eeset

.
LIFETIME MEMBER
Yes it does. If you click on it, it takes you to a page that says "and the winner is" click on that and it tells who the winner is.
OK. I had clicked on Sophist so I guess that is still undecided.

I nominate John W.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
But when confronted with the unassailable fact that the Court that gave us Roe was dominated by appointments made by Republican regimes

this was 40 years ago

he mentions it almost every time
but
you won't see him talk about what is going on today
 

Eeset

.
LIFETIME MEMBER
this is not true

I will accept anything that restricts abortion
and
I have said in the past that I do not see judges overturning roe
but
I do see judges allowing many consecutive laws restricting abortion that will eventually make roe meaningless
Chrys there is no need for laws or courts. Women can decide this issue. They just need good values. That is the missing part of the equation.
 
Top