Calvinism, Arminianism, and Open theism
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
Originally Posted by Knight
Calvinism: Logical yet not biblical
Arminianism: Illogical and not biblical
Open Theism: Logical and biblical
Glad to see you two agreeing on something...:think:
And by something I mean, of course, spelling.
I personally find Calvinism without Hobbes a poor read, Arminianism uncomfortably tailored, and the open view too panoramic.
So I hope I've settled the matter for you. :thumb:
Think nothing of it...that's how I came to my understanding on the matter, anyway.
lain:...what?
Calvinism: Logical yet not biblical
Arminianism: Illogical and not biblical
Open Theism: Logical and biblical
Glad to see you two agreeing on something...:think:
And by something I mean, of course, spelling.
I personally find Calvinism without Hobbes a poor read, Arminianism uncomfortably tailored, and the open view too panoramic.
So I hope I've settled the matter for you. :thumb:
Think nothing of it...that's how I came to my understanding on the matter, anyway.
lain:...what?
:rotfl:
themuzicman
Well-known member
I don't know, can you be the creator of TOL and be created by TOL at the same time?
If one were able to take a piece of TOL to oneself, sure.
Muz
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Heresy No. 5.
Retard that is number 7,209.
Where are all the Arminians?
The title of this thread is Calvinism, Amrinianism, and Open theism. Let's here what they have to say.
The title of this thread is Calvinism, Amrinianism, and Open theism. Let's here what they have to say.
Aren't you one??
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Since no one can spell Arminian, I suppose that explains why none of them are showing up. :squint:
That's Knights fault, I copied and pasted it from the thread title
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Yes, I know. Which was the point of my post.
Retard that is number 595.
What type of heretic are you?
I guess I would fall into the Closed category on the whole "spelling" controversy--which now seems far from Settled.
:think:
I'm going. I'm going.
A fellow tries to interject a little levity and the next thing you know he's hopping the ban-train to Sorrytown. :angel:
I can tell you from here that he's not much of a dancer. :idunno:
:think:
I'm going. I'm going.
A fellow tries to interject a little levity and the next thing you know he's hopping the ban-train to Sorrytown. :angel:
What type of heretic are you?
I can tell you from here that he's not much of a dancer. :idunno:
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Look what you've started, "Spellgate".
Not that I mind giving the Clintons a few swift kicks, but I prefer to accuse them of evils they really did! I'm just saying:idunno::idea: Is it too late to blame the whole thing on the Clintons? :think:
Calvinism's determinism is a no-go.
You misrepresent Arminianism if you think he/it taught faith + works. It is within the Reformed tradition of salvation by grace through faith alone. It is not uncommon to confuse modern Arminianism with Pelagianism that may be a problem (vs semi-Pelagian). Roger E. Olson IVP 'Arminian Theology' refutes the myth of thinking faith +works is what Arminius taught.
Unconditional eternal security (OSAS) is not biblical, so guilty as charged.
Open Theism, properly understood, does not compromise biblical attributes, including omniscience. It is a more biblical, coherent free will theism than Arminianism.
eveningsky339
New member
Arrzmoaienian is fairly simple to spell. I don't see what the problem is.
As for all the choices...
1 Peter 1:2
Time is part of Creation. That's why the universe is 4-dimensional and not just 3-dimensional-- we have time.