You haven't answered the question - what did Christ do on the cross? He defeated sin and death. Is sin and death eternal now? No. Do we need grace if there is no sin? No. Is grace eternal? No. Does it matter, does it convict God of a crime to say there is no grace at some point in the future? No. Does God's word suffer by implying that grace will cease? No. Is universalism justified under the assumption that grace will be available after people die? Only if you provide evidence of another point where God might reasonably consider removing grace.logos_x said:If anything is eternal, then surely what Christ did is eternal in it's accomplishments.
When you try to correlate universalism and God's word with:
"the answer(s) .. are the same answers in both universal salvation and God's word. The difference is that in universal salvation, grace is still there, and in God's word it isn't."
you only open one door and that door leads to the rejection of universalism. God's word suffers not at all from God's future plans.