I looked at all and especially and tried to interpret in light of the rest of scripture and keep it in context. Here, you make a statement (highlighted in bold) that does not make sense. Destruction means the act of destroying. Destroy means to reduce (an object) to useless fragments, a useless form, or remains, as by rending, burning, or dissolving; injure beyond repair or renewal; demolish; ruin; annihilate. The definition destruction must include eternal torment within its possibilities. Destruction does not imply living outside.red77 said:Destruction can sometimes mean different (albeit negative usually) things, a persons life can be destroyed by drug abuse, the person could physically die from an overdose in which case you could say that his habit lead to his physical destruction - or his life could be destroyed because his habit could have cost him his marriage/job/sanity etc....one thing destruction doesnt translate as is endless suffering.....the wide gate leads to destruction doesnt mean eternal hell unless its translated or doctrinised to do so
I do not believe that Jesus can't save the whole world. Jesus's sacrifice for the whole world and it was sucesful. It forever tore down the wall of sin that seperates men and God. The issue is not what Jesus can or can't do, it is what He has said will be. Eternal life is offered to those who accept Jesus on faith. It not that Jesus can't save them, it is people who refuse to be saved.red77 said:Thank you for answering honestly However i think its fair to say that a simple rebuttal to this would be that if the verse meant only those who would accept in this life would be saved then the passage would read "God is the saviour of all men who believe", the especially is still at the crux of that passage because any argument that maintains limited salvation has to by association try and change the definition of that word......you're right in that its a hard verse when defending the doctrine of ET....
In light of all the other scriptures available there are many that have been presented that speak of God being the ransom for all to be testified to in due time
God being all in all
All things being possible with God etc.................even just the one about all things being possible with God is very difficult to defend with the doctrine of ET because you already believe that Jesus cant save the world and its man who messes it up......and yet this answer was given to the disciples after asking "who then can be saved"?
Universalism teaches that everbody will eventually come to believe in one of two paths. They will believe of their own act of will while on earth. If not, they will be tortured in hell until they see the error of their ways and accept Jesus. The first path is Biblical. The second path is not. There is nothing in scripture that says you will go to the lake of fire that says you will only stay until your are of the proper frame of mind. It is refered to as the second death. Period.
Can you show me a verse that says flatout and in context that you only have to stay in "hell" until you accept Jesus. I can and have pointed to verses that indicate hell is real and forever eventhough I know you disagree with the term forever. Even if we throw that part of the argument out, you must admit that people who go to hell for an age-during are not offered an out until the end of the age-during. And if you go by ages, the Bible is uterly silent on what happens after the age-during of hell. Can you find any erse that indicates there are ages after the age-during of hell (for lack of a better term).