Bob Headed to Palin Protest in Indy

[fool]

Sarah states ""I oppose the use of public funds for elective abortions." Since when are ALL abortions not elective?

Ectopic pregnancy.

 

[Rusha]

Ectopic pregnancy.

Agreed ... I should have made it clear I was not speaking of ectopic pregnancies.

 

[fool]

Agreed ... I should have made it clear I was not speaking of ectopic pregnancies.

That's prolly what Palin was talking about.

 

[chatmaggot]

good luck with your approach

I think we should concentrate on getting rid of those democrats who currently hold office since the Democratic Party platform supports federal funding of abortion and liberal judges who will keep abortion legal

I truly believe that you are being intentionally obtuse. I have shown that it isn't just the Democrats that support federal funded abortions...but republicans also.

Republican's also support liberal judges who keep abortion legal.

To deny otherwise shows you are care more about a party and beating another party rather than standing for the truth.

 

[Nitro]

we need conservative judges who won't find laws against abortion unconstitutional

this will happen only when we can elect enough Republicans

This has not worked and it will not work. Palin did just the opposite of what you stated and you still wonder why they are protesting her and do not support her :sigh:

 

[Lighthouse]

good luck with your approach

I think we should concentrate on getting rid of those democrats who currently hold office since the Democratic Party platform supports federal funding of abortion and liberal judges who will keep abortion legal

Palin appointed a former member of Planned Parenthood to the Alaskan Supreme Court, just this past summer. Do you think this woman is not a liberal judge who will keep abortion legal?

 

[Jefferson]

chrysostom:

So now that you know that Palin supports federal funding for abortion, if she is the Republican nominee for president next time, will you still vote for her? Yes or no?

 

[chrysostom]

chrysostom:

So now that you know that Palin supports federal funding for abortion, if she is the Republican nominee for president next time, will you still vote for her? Yes or no?

no, I do not know that she supports federal funding for abortion

you don't know either

but

go ahead with you fine distinctions if you don't mind being irrelevant

 

[Jefferson]

no, I do not know that she supports federal funding for abortion

you don't know either

Oh yes I do too.

The Anchorage Daily News asked her, "do you support or oppose the use of public funds for abortion?"17 Sarah should have answered correctly that it is always wrong to intentionally kill an innocent child, therefore, she should have unequivocally opposed forcing tax payers to kill some "unwanted" children. Instead Palin crafted, in ten written words,"I oppose the use of public funds for elective abortions."18 19By this Palin goes further than even the many "pro-choice" people who think the government should never pay for abortion, by indicating that some babies should not be protected by law but instead killed with tax dollars."

 

[chrysostom]

Oh yes I do too.

congratulations

you are irrelevant

 

[GuySmiley]

congratulations

you are irrelevant

Is there anything you won't compromise for relevancy? Keep on supporting abortion and sleep well knowing you are relevant :thumb:

 

[chrysostom]

Is there anything you won't compromise for relevancy? Keep on supporting abortion and sleep well knowing you are relevant :thumb:

that doesn't make sense

I am clearly against abortion, you have no basis to even question that

so you want to try that again?

 

[Punisher1984]

So, we have an irrelevant political movement (the monarchists) protesting against an irrelevant politician (Sarah Palin) - it's like a match made in heaven!

:chuckle:

 

[chrysostom]

So, we have an irrelevant political movement (the monarchists) protesting against an irrelevant politician (Sarah Palin) - it's like a match made in heaven!

:chuckle:

did you see how many books she is selling?

 

[Punisher1984]

did you see how many books she is selling?

All that means is that she has found her niche market - selling books does not a political force make (just ask Pat Robertson).

 

[Jefferson]

congratulations

you are irrelevant

So let me get this straight. You are willing to sin against God by voting for a known proabort just so you can be "relevant." If I'm misunderstanding your position, please clarify.

 

[WizardofOz]

So let me get this straight. You are willing to sin against God by voting for a known proabort just so you can be "relevant." If I'm misunderstanding your position, please clarify.

Just so long as there is an "R" next to the name :thumb:

 

[DocJohnson]

Palin appointed a former member of Planned Parenthood to the Alaskan Supreme Court, just this past summer. Do you think this woman is not a liberal judge who will keep abortion legal?

Abortion is Federal law. Appointing a state judge in Massachusetts or Maryland or Missouri will have zero impact on that.

So now that you know that Palin supports federal funding for abortion...

Jefferson, do you support states' rights?

 

[chrysostom]

Just so long as there is an "R" next to the name :thumb:

the only way we can do anything about abortion is to get conservative judges on the federal courts

to do that we must elect republicans

why don't you understand that?

 

[Granite]

So, we have an irrelevant political movement (the monarchists) protesting against an irrelevant politician (Sarah Palin) - it's like a match made in heaven!

:chuckle:

Extremely well put!

If the press liked Todd Palin being a member of a secessionist party they'll downright love talk of shadow government, monarchy, and Enyart's constitution that's mysteriously no longer available on the web. (Can't imagine why.)

This ought to be very entertaining.