The maternity ward?Being rich is so negatively quoted in NT including Jesus' own ward.
The maternity ward?Being rich is so negatively quoted in NT including Jesus' own ward.
It was the house, not saying it was His house.
Your interpretation is convenient for your advantage.
It was the house, not saying it was His house.
Your interpretation is convenient for your advantage.
Peter had a house
Mat 8:14
And when Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his wife's mother laid, and sick of a fever.
I know he did.
we are talking about Jesus.
being a lazy dumbo is just as much a sin. lain:
I already dealt with Jesus' house. Jesus was in "THE house" in His home town. "The" is definite article for a specific house. What is your theory of which specific house it was? Its not any old house, otherwise the indefinite article "a" would have been used.
Now I ask you to deal with Peter's house.
It is clear that Jesus is opposed to rich people in over all. You cannot stay wealthy if you love Jesus.
It is clear that Jesus is opposed to rich people in over all. You cannot stay wealthy if you love Jesus.
There are plenty of scriptures to the effect that wealth can be a problem.
Mat 19:24
And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Rev 3:17
Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
etc.
Wealth CAN be a problem.
But it is more the attitude to wealth that is a problem
Mar 4:19
And the cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of other things entering in, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful.
1Ti 6:10
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
It is not a given that being rich, per se, is a sin. Nor can one say "You cannot stay wealthy if you love Jesus." Nothing is that simple. Many very rich folks like Abraham, David, Job will be in the kingdom. They were not preoccupied with wealth. They loved the Lord much more than wealth. It is possible today for Christians in the Western world, who tend to be very wealthy, to have a healthy attitude towards wealth, and to be able to be Christians and rich.
There is coming a time when Christians may have to choose between wealth or serving God, when the mark of the Beast is enforced. The Antichrist will try to enforce obedience to false religion by cutting off the Christian's access to banking if they refuse to submit to him. That does not pertain now.
Does everything belong to God, Meshak?Why are you so defensive of wealthy?
Can one own a house and be saved?
Peter, Lazarus, Levi, Simon the taner, even Jesus owned houses.
Today if one owns a house, that house is worth a million. So as home owners and therefore millionaires, can one be saved?
You all can twist and manipulate and use all the guile you can conjure up and it doesn't mean nothing. If you want to prove me wrong your going to have to do it with scripture. Just go to the OP and show me which of them verses is wrong or not true. You got deceived outside scripture, not your arguing with me outside of scripture. When A True Christian isn't even allowed to think outside of scripture.
[1Co 4:6
6 Now these things, brethren, I have figuratively transferred to myself and Apollos for your sakes, that you may learn in us not to think beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up on behalf of one against the other.
[Rev 22:18-19
18 For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book;
19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.
Squeaky, since Meshak doesn't have the guts to answer, does everything belong to God?
No, not a trick question, and I'm glad you answered with a straightforward answer, thank you for that. Not many people whom I have discussions with on here can answer simple questions like that with answers like yours.I said
lol Is this one of them trick questions. We know that everything belongs to God.
I hope this question doesn't have any guile in it.
Hey JR,
You are on ignore.
So I don't reply to any of your posts including questions.
You are too ignorant of Jesus' word or teachings.
Expected response from Meshak: 1. Silence 2. "Good day" |
No, not a trick question, and I'm glad you answered with a straightforward answer, thank you for that. Not many people whom I have discussions with on here can answer simple questions like that with answers like yours.
Ok, so, we both agree that everything belongs to God.
Here's my next question, with follow-up:
Since everything belongs to God, doesn't that make Him rich? And if so, would it not be hypocritical of God to demand that we give away our wealth, while he remain rich?
That's nonsense, the wealth of this world is nothing to do with God, true wealth in God is being blessed with the Holy Spirit.No, not a trick question, and I'm glad you answered with a straightforward answer, thank you for that. Not many people whom I have discussions with on here can answer simple questions like that with answers like yours.
Ok, so, we both agree that everything belongs to God.
Here's my next question, with follow-up:
Since everything belongs to God, doesn't that make Him rich? And if so, would it not be hypocritical of God to demand that we give away our wealth, while he remain rich?