Are you saying that God did "drive them out"?
A YES or NO would be great.
A YES or NO would be great.
Does national Israel exist today?
Are you saying that God did "drive them out"?
A YES or NO would be great.
YES.Are you saying God did not?
Do you understand the boundaries God established for Israel still have gentiles occupying them? 3000 years after the prophecy?
YES.
I am saying God DID NOT drive them out.
Now please answer my question.
Are you saying that God did "drive them out"?
A YES or NO would be great.
The prophecy had nothing to do with "boundaries," but with occupation of a certain land, which was certainly fulfilled for the Jews.
The only way this prophecy would have gone unfulfilled, is if Israel never occupied Canaan and Palestine.
Well then, you just lost the argument.Yes, and yes.
The first yes, is regarding the historical occupation of the Jews in Canaan and Palestine. The second yes, regards the spiritual application of this prophecy and promise.
On a side note.......
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=11342&stc=1&d=1181589907
...Every time I get on here, I can't help but notice Baloney is online reading this thread.
Hi baloney :wave:
:wazzup:
The prophecy had nothing to do with "boundaries," but with occupation of a certain land, which was certainly fulfilled for the Jews.
The only way this prophecy would have gone unfulfilled, is if Israel never occupied Canaan and Palestine.
AMR,
How about crafting an argument against the Open Theist's position on atonement rather than something that you or some other Calvinist has made up out of whole cloth?
I am not, in any way whatsoever, an Arminian, suggesting otherwise is either ignorance or a lie.
I do not, in neither quality nor quantity, limit the value of the Christ's death on the cross.
I do not, in any way, believe that I saved myself, nor that anyone else is capable of the same saying otherwise is a game of semantics played by those who aren't interested in engaging the Open View on its merits but rather in winning the emotional allegiance of the weak minded who like the theological status quo more than the truth.
Basically your entire post is one enormous waste of time aside from the portions of it that delineate your own position as no one here is an Arminian and this thread is not about Arminianism but rather the Open View, which very simply is not the same thing. I can defeat the Arminian position quicker and easier than you can and do so with more logical coherence in that I'm not undermining my own position in doing so as you would be. If anything Arminianism is nothing more than a subset of and reaction too Calvinism. Open Theism has nothing to do with either of them.
Resting in Him,
Clete
Well then, you just lost the argument.
Were you aware that God Himself tells us that He DIDN'T drive them out?
God DID NOT drive them out even though He said that He would "without fail".
Would you admit that you didn't know about this story and spoke out of ignorance? Will you agree (now that you know better) to never again assert that God did drive them out when God Himself states that He didn't drive them out?
Will you admit you were wrong?
Yet it was God Himself who said He DIDN'T drive them out.You OVT'ers continually argue as if everything in this world has already reached full conclusion. Not so . . .there is more to come and more to learn.
Do the named tribes listed in the prophecy of Joshua 3:10 function in that land today?
Nope.
And you will find I am not easily manipulated, either.
Nang
You OVT'ers continually argue as if everything in this world has already reached full conclusion.
Not so . . .there is more to come and more to learn.
These would be simple 'yes' or 'no' questions if you definition of the terms weren't so loaded with your theology. As it is there is no way to answer these questions in a straight forward way as they are asked here.Thank you for your comments, Clete.
The answers are only a simple 'yes' or 'no' requiring no straining of the scriptures to elaborate an answer.
- Do you believe that the sinner is dead, not just dying, but completely spiritually dead in their sins?
- Do you believe that there is absolutely nothing the sinner can do to save themselves, that is that the sinner cannot originate the love for God in their heart since the sinner is a captive and willing slave to sin unable to deliver themselves from its corruption?
- Do you believe that the lost are able to only sin more or sin less, that is the sinner is wholly inclined to evil and therefore lacks any abilities of spritual discernment?
- Do you believe that given the sinner's innate sinful state of mind, as a condition of his sinful nature, it is beyond the power of the the sinner's will to change it?
And you will find I am not easily manipulated, either.
Are you saying that God did "drive them out"?
A YES or NO would be great.
Oh the irony! :rotfl::rotfl:
How can a Calvinist say they are not easily manipulated?
Oh the irony! :rotfl:
Maybe what Nang meant to say was..... "I am not easily manipulated... I am completely manipulated."