Another death friom the covid vaccine leftists cannot hide

[expos4ever]

FAUCI LIED, MILLIONS DIED — Fauci Was Informed of Hydroxychloroquine Success in Early 2020 But Lied to Public Instead Despite the Science​

The Gateway Pundit? Surely ye jest:

The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[21] The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes.[9][36][37] It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news"

 

[marke]

Give your head a shake man!!! This in no way supports your groundless claim that Fauci bears any responsibility for Covid. You are moving the goalposts.

Dim-witted leftist cheerleaders and worshippers of the democrat god, Saint Fauci: 'Damn anyone claiming Dr. Fauci had anything to do with the Wuhan lab or that the Wuhan lab had anything to do with the development and release of the covid-19 virus.'

 

[expos4ever]

Dim-witted leftist cheerleaders and worshippers of the democrat god, Saint Fauci: 'Damn anyone claiming Dr. Fauci had anything to do with the Wuhan lab or that the Wuhan lab had anything to do with the development and release of the covid-19 virus.'

Correction: "Legitimately asking for evidence from anyone claiming Dr. Fauci had anything to do with the Wuhan lab or that the Wuhan lab had anything to do with the development and release of the covid-19 virus."

You continue to spread untruths. And, yes, claiming that Dr. Fauci has some responsibility for Covid, with no supporting evidence, is essentially a fib.

 

[marke]

Correction: "Legitimately asking for evidence from anyone claiming Dr. Fauci had anything to do with the Wuhan lab or that the Wuhan lab had anything to do with the development and release of the covid-19 virus."

You continue to spread untruths. And, yes, claiming that Dr. Fauci has some responsibility for Covid, with no supporting evidence, is essentially a fib.

Don't worry. Good politicians in Congress are demanding answers from Fauci so the additional evidence you are looking for should be soon coming out.

House Republicans demand Fauci testify, release unredacted emails: report

The GOP lawmakers wrote a letter asking for Dr. Anthony Fauci to appear before congress in the wake of his emails being released.

nypost.com

House Republicans have written letters to the Democratic chairmen of two committees to compel Dr. Anthony Fauci to testify and reveal the unredacted versions of his emails that were released this week — and stirred up the controversy surrounding the theory that the coronavirus leaked from a Chinese lab, according to a report Thursday.
Reps. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and James Comer (R-Ky.) wrote to the chairs of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus and the House Oversight Committee to say it is “imperative” that Fauci appear before the lawmakers, Fox News reported.
In their letter, Scalise and Comer said the thousands of pages of Fauci’s emails released this week by BuzzFeed News via a Freedom of Information Act request “debunk many Democrats’ claims from the past year,” including that Fauci and other scientists were “muzzled” by the Trump administration.
“More importantly, the emails contain new evidence regarding the origins of COVID-19, including the possibility it leaked from a U.S. taxpayer funded laboratory,” the two wrote.
“It is now imperative that Dr. Fauci come before our Committees to provide information related to the origins of the novel coronavirus as well as the U.S. government’s role in funding research that may have contributed to the development of the novel coronavirus,” Scalise and Comer wrote.
“The American people have a right to know what our government knew about the origins of the pandemic and when it was known.”
In the letter, they also demanded “unredacted versions of all of Dr. Fauci’s recently released emails.”

 

[expos4ever]

Don't worry. Good politicians in Congress are demanding answers from Fauci so the additional evidence you are looking for should be soon coming out.

Additional evidence? You mean additional to zero?

 

[marke]

Additional evidence? You mean additional to zero?

How is it that you are unaware of Fauci's involvement with the Wuhan lab?

 

[expos4ever]

How is it that you are unaware of Fauci's involvement with the Wuhan lab?

Where is your evidence?

This is a simple question. And, of course, one you cannot answer, since you have arrived at your conclusion on this matter for reasons that have nothing to do with actual evidence.

And so you dance.

Was Fauci "involved" in the sense that you imply? Maybe he was. But unless there is evidence, this remains only a possibility.

 

[JudgeRightly]

The Gateway Pundit?

Genetic fallacy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[JudgeRightly]

Where is your evidence?

Are you even bothering to read the links posted at this point? Or are you being a troll?

Don't worry. Good politicians in Congress are demanding answers from Fauci so the additional evidence you are looking for should be soon coming out.

House Republicans demand Fauci testify, release unredacted emails: report

The GOP lawmakers wrote a letter asking for Dr. Anthony Fauci to appear before congress in the wake of his emails being released.

nypost.com

House Republicans have written letters to the Democratic chairmen of two committees to compel Dr. Anthony Fauci to testify and reveal the unredacted versions of his emails that were released this week — and stirred up the controversy surrounding the theory that the coronavirus leaked from a Chinese lab, according to a report Thursday.
Reps. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and James Comer (R-Ky.) wrote to the chairs of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus and the House Oversight Committee to say it is “imperative” that Fauci appear before the lawmakers, Fox News reported.
In their letter, Scalise and Comer said the thousands of pages of Fauci’s emails released this week by BuzzFeed News via a Freedom of Information Act request “debunk many Democrats’ claims from the past year,” including that Fauci and other scientists were “muzzled” by the Trump administration.
“More importantly, the emails contain new evidence regarding the origins of COVID-19, including the possibility it leaked from a U.S. taxpayer funded laboratory,” the two wrote.
“It is now imperative that Dr. Fauci come before our Committees to provide information related to the origins of the novel coronavirus as well as the U.S. government’s role in funding research that may have contributed to the development of the novel coronavirus,” Scalise and Comer wrote.
“The American people have a right to know what our government knew about the origins of the pandemic and when it was known.”
In the letter, they also demanded “unredacted versions of all of Dr. Fauci’s recently released emails.”

 

[marke]

Where is your evidence?

This is a simple question. And, of course, one you cannot answer, since you have arrived at your conclusion on this matter for reasons that have nothing to do with actual evidence.

And so you dance.

Was Fauci "involved" in the sense that you imply? Maybe he was. But unless there is evidence, this remains only a possibility.

Democrats defending leftist crooks: 'You cannot say a democrat or leftist is guilty until he has been convicted of guilt in a court of law and all appeals have been exhausted in his defense.'

 

[expos4ever]

Genetic fallacy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

No.

The "genetic fallacy" rejoinder would be valid if you had made an actual argument. But you did not - you merely referred us to content from a source. The whole weight of your post rests on whether the material in that article is credible - you are relying on a source, and a highly disreputable one at that, not your own arguments, to make your point.

Taking down Gateway Pundit - which is like shooting fish in a barrel - is very much fair game.

 

[JudgeRightly]

No.

Yes.

The "genetic fallacy" rejoinder would be valid if you had made an actual argument.

The argument is being made by TGP.

Disprove the argument. Don't attack the one making it.

But you

I'm simply pointing out your fallacy.

did not - you merely referred us to content from a source.

And in return, you are attacking the source, rather than the content.

That's called a genetic fallacy.

The whole weight of your post rests on whether the material in that article is credible

So invalidate the material.

Stop attacking the source.

- you are relying on a source,

I am?

and a highly disreputable one at that,

Are you able to address the content being presented? Or are you too preoccupied with where it's coming from?

If it's the latter, you are committing a genetic fallacy.

not your own arguments, to make your point.

Presenting evidence is a normal thing to do, even if it comes from places one may dislike.

Taking down Gateway Pundit

Seems to be your only goal in this and other threads.

- which is like shooting fish in a barrel - is very much fair game.

Except it's not. It's called a fallacy for a reason, Expos.