-so does town
a whore for the republican party
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
-so does town
He made a blanket statement about democrats that was, at best, misleading. I think that's important and that sort of thing makes the next distortion inevitable. By way of:
That's what I'm speaking to...chrys also knows that I mostly vote conservative, much more often than not for the party he mistakenly believes is the singular defender of public virtue. But his first distortion leads him to a comfort zone for the next, where he speaks for me and gets it wrong. I don't feel better voting for democrats or I'd join the party and pull the lever...at least pull the lever for them more often than not, which isn't and never has been the case with me.
I only address my not supporting the President in his current term when someone, like Sod here, attempts to concentrate on the first vote as though it encompasses my opinion, neglecting the second altogether and what it says about my nonpartisan context.
You asked me I told you. Unlike this bit of unsupported fiction:
Quote me being anything less than clear to anyone ever asking me that question. I'll wait while that never happens.
lain:
-he didn't answer the first time
-and
-I knew I had him
-and
-he knew I wouldn't give up
-and
-I knew I had him
-and
-he knew I wouldn't give up
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
nah - it's long gone in the thread deletes
even if it wasn't, it's not worth looking for
enough of us remember it
much like the thread where zippy was trying to nail you down on gay marriage, you equivocated for a long time before you finally admitted that
You Voted For Obama
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
The very first time you asked me who I voted for I told you. Set out a quote making any other case.
lain: Literally, the first time you asked.
The very first time you asked me who I voted for I told you. Set out a quote making any other case.
-not true
-literally
:yawn: Produce the quote.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
right
in a discussion about the presidential election, chrys asked you who you voted for
your response was to describe how you voted in your state and local elections
why?
because you're a dishonest scumbag
It really is. Set out a quote that makes a contrary point. If you're going to make a claim about the record produce it.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
suck a lemon
I answered a general question with a general answer.
Then he particularly asked who I had voted for in the presidential election and I answered him.
-we know how many threads have been deleted
-so
-it is your word against mine
-and
-I can live with that
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
I think you're counting on it. I think you and Sod are, sadly, so blinkered and blinded by personal animosity that it impairs you.
I was never obligated to answer you on my vote. What we have here is a clear present record of me being unambiguous on my vote, both for Obama in his first run and against him in his second.
Set against that we have a couple of allegations by people who can't produce a quote to the contrary and a clear history of being less than objective when it comes to me.
Not really. Supra.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
take notice chrys (and others who are following along) how his language changes when he's on the ropes, realizes he's been bested and isn't willing to admit he's wrong :darwinsm:
it becomes supra dupra!
and as far as "personal animosity" (which just a fancy way of whining "Mommy! Make them stop being mean to me!) goes, why shouldn't i feel animosity towards a lying scumbag who voted for bammy?
-we now have
-bernie on the left
-and
-trump on the right
-because you
-and
-others voted for obama
-voters have never been more angry
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
-55 users
-is that some kind of record?
-town knows numbers
-is that some kind of record?
-town knows numbers