I thought I made an illuminating point by taking their illogic to an extreme. I am happy with the post. I believe you are purposely trying to miss the point.
31 Reasons To Reject The Jab
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Pffft, I'll talk about politics of any country as I see fit so suck it up and deal with it.
Right Divider
Body part
Here some great logic for you: The unvaccinated need to get vaccinated to protect the vaccinated.
Right Divider
Body part
I see your problem... right there.
It is good logic actually. Let me attempt to make it clearer for you. People who are not yet vaccinated give the virus more ability to spread and mutate. Vaccinated people reduce but do not eliminate the spread of the virus. Some people cannot get vaccinated because of allergy.Here some great logic for you: The unvaccinated need to get vaccinated to protect the vaccinated.
Thus, the willfuly unvaccinated (ie those without contraindications) would contribute to the greater good if they were vaccinated. Reducing spread helps others who are vaccinated by further reducing the chance of infection and mutation. It especially helps those who were not eligible to be vaccinated.
If I don't take my vitamins, that will prevent your vitamins from working for you. Don't you get it?Here some great logic for you: The unvaccinated need to get vaccinated to protect the vaccinated.
Right Divider
Body part
Right Divider
Body part
That's why I always put "vaccine" in quotes when talking about the COVID-19 "vaccines".
You are an all-or-none thinker. Do you have a disability is is this willful ignorance? A good discussion involves supporting your conclusions and explaining them rather that just professing them with greater and greater ire.
The vaccine helps most people who take it, it hurts a small fraction. The magnitude of help is not as high as we might like largely because of new strains. It does not even completely immunize us from the original strain. People demanding absolutes in this world will be continually disappointed. Maybe a promise of absolutes that can never be proven or disproven will satisfy such people.
Right Divider
Body part
No, I am not. I'm a completely reasonable person.
The effectiveness of the "vaccines" has shown to be far short of what was originally claimed. But people like Brandon keep claiming that it's the ultimate solution to this problem. It's not.
Again, that "small fraction" is FAR larger that many are willing to admit. If other vaccines had the proportion of problem that this one has, they would have be pulled long ago.
Indeed, these "vaccines" are designed in a way that does NOT handle the inevitable mutations well at all. Therefore, they are not the solution to this problem.
BINGO.
Nobody is "demanding absolutes in this world" with regard to "vaccines".
If you are a baby boomer you will remember this advice: Teach your children well by Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.
Mamas: Don't let your children take the Fauci jab, please, for their own safety.
Pfizer Announces Vaccine Provides Insufficient Protection for Young Children | National Review
The companies said that ‘no safety concerns were identified’ in the trial.
www.nationalreview.com
Pfizer and BioNTech announced on Friday that the companies will modify a clinical trial for their coronavirus vaccine in young children, after a two-dose regimen did not produce a sufficient immune response in children ages 2, 3, and 4.
In other words, they are using our children as guinea pigs
Red Wave Rising
Yuge
If you are a baby boomer you will remember this advice: Teach your children well by Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.
Mamas: Don't let your children take the Fauci jab, please, for their own safety.
Pfizer Announces Vaccine Provides Insufficient Protection for Young Children | National Review
The companies said that ‘no safety concerns were identified’ in the trial.
Pfizer and BioNTech announced on Friday that the companies will modify a clinical trial for their coronavirus vaccine in young children, after a two-dose regimen did not produce a sufficient immune response in children ages 2, 3, and 4.
Interesting. The CDC just recommended taking the new vaccine from those two companies and NOT Johnson and Johnson.
Do we have some crony capitalism/socialism here?
CDC recommends people not get J&J vaccine if Pfizer, Moderna are available
CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky signed off on language that says the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna are the "preferred" options over Johnson & Johnson's.
www.nbcnews.com
Or just an obvious decision based on the data. J and J is less effective and prone to greater adverse reactions.
Red Wave Rising
Yuge
It may be obvious to great world renown doctors such as yourself, but not to us little serfs.
Oh wait, that's right, you're not a doctor are you. You're a socialist who believes that a woman thinking she's a man makes her a man and that's real science.
Too bad all decisions are not based on data or the Biden administration would have trashed masking and vaccine mandates long ago.