Search results

Listen to what? To the patent lie that those on the left are in favour of infanticide (to cite just one example of the falsehoods in that absurd diagram)? Let's be clear about something - the right in America has recently decided that lying is acceptable. And you guys lie and lie and lie. And...

This is not much of a case - you merely assert that humans have certain individual rights that are never to be reigned in in the interests of others. This is begging the question. Whether this is the law in your country is beside the point - laws can be "wrong". Later in your post you again...

How many times would an otherwise rational person need to be struck on the head with a heavy mallet before the state of mind needed to concoct such a wildly misleading chart would be reached? I think it would take at least 10 sturdy whacks..........

I am skeptical that they will change - they have a deeply-ingrained personal need to believe in such piffle. They will "leave", of course, but only via attrition through death. I think, though, there is reason for optimism in the long run. Look at the broad sweep of human history - bad thinking...

When I write of the rights of the collective, I really mean "the rights of the individuals who make up the collective". It is simple common sense that sometimes it is best to limit the rights of one person in the interests of the rights of many others who might otherwise be harmed by that first...

I do not follow your reasoning. You appear to be arguing for an all-or-nothing position - either a person's rights as an individual always trump the will of the collective or they never do. Is this what you are saying. It seems eminently reasonable to believe that the optimal way to structure a...

Arrested at a Waffle House you say. Who'da thunk it?

And if you had "handed someone their teeth" for a perfectly innocent event such as we in the Biden video, you would be joining our dear friend from the Trump rally in the crowbar motel.

Bazinga - this image alone makes the case. If you are going to call what Joe did pedophilia, we should lock up this drooling sex-crazed woman and toss the key. This thread is a veritable clinic in the phenomena of cognitive dissonance. On the other hand, given the absolutely bonkers thinking...

You may think this is an effective rejoinder. But let's be clear: no one reading this thread who does not come to it with an emotional need to believe Joe Biden is a pedophile will think that what is seen in that video is anything remotely inappropriate. But let's explore this further. What...

Nonsense - I am saying nothing of the kind. This nut (leatherneck) is suggesting that a video showing a distracted old man's hand casually grazing the chest area of a young girls constitutes pedophilia. That, my friend, is the very definition of knee-to-the-groin stupidity.

You call that groping? You really need to get out more.

I apologize for the tautology that is "MAGA nutjob".

Listen you-know-what-for-brains: Only a MAGA nutjob would call that pedophilia.

You need to come clean with us and stop your two-stepping: Are you suggesting that what we see in that video constitutes pedophilia? Yes or No.

I found it myself. You must be joking - you call that casual, most likely accidental, brushing of the hand pedophilia? No wonder you believe the rest of that whole package of nonsense.

Post a link. Otherwise you are blowing smoke.

Are these rocket scientists trying to claim that Biden merely touching a child in a non-sexual area constitutes pedophilia?

We all know the truth: If you really had any incriminating video against Biden, you would have posted it. But, of course, you have been caught in promulgating falsehoods. And so you dance.

Nice try. You made the claim; you bear the burden of proof.