Lon

Lon

Well-known member
Joined
Last seen
Messages
11,707
Reaction score
6,840
Points
113

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • MichaelCadry
    Thanks so much, Lon! You're very kind and thoughtful !!. I truly do appreciate it! Don't think I didn't notice!! Praise God!!
    Town Heretic
    Thanks for the nudge. I'm going to try not engaging on any hostile level with him or much of anyone if I can help it. And the way he's moved the old challenge makes it pointless anyway. :)
    Derf
    I can understand that, especially in light of the thread topic. And yes, I would say I lean toward the idea of an open view of God's foreknowledge, not that everything has to be open, but that God is able to bring about His will without pre-determining everything that ever happened/happens/will happen. I think the Omnis, despite your signature, have to bend to scripture's depiction of God, rather than the other way around.
    MichaelCadry
    Hey Lon!! I hope that all is going well with you tonight!! Thanks for your help the other day. It was deeply appreciated indeed!! Thank you!! Tyrathca is a real piece of work! Praise God And His Son, Jesus, And The Holy Ghost!! Selah!!
    Derf
    Re:
    Well, realize this website is owned by Open Theists, so there is a denial of the Omni's of God. It will come up in conversation merely because of the need to cover that base. -Lon

    Nice to hear from you again, Lon.

    I wasn't sure what you were referring to. What is the "it" in the second sentence? The denials of the omni's or something else?

    I don't know that I've detected as much denials of the omnis so much as using different definitions of the words. Like the idea that God is still omniscient even if He doesn't foreknow everything about the future, since the future being not a thing yet, isn't a thing to be known yet.
    Tambora
    continued:

    By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.

    The owners of TheologyOnline reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason.

    By agreeing to our terms you grant TheologyOnline and it's owners the right publish and or re-publish any content that you post on these community forums.

    All members of this community participate at the pleasure of the TheologyOnline staff and your participation can be terminated for any reason at any time.

    You do not have the right to NOT be offended on these forums. We have a diverse group of members and we do not control the things they post (within reason) including things that might offend you.
    Tambora
    Here's the whole thing.
    (Will have to do in two parts as it is long.)

    Registration rules to accept before joining.

    Forum Rules
    Registration to this forum is free! We do insist that you abide by the rules and policies detailed below. If you agree to the terms, please check the 'I agree' checkbox and press the 'Register' button below. If you would like to cancel the registration, click*here*to return to the forums index.

    Although the administrators and moderators of TheologyOnline will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of TheologyOnline, nor Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message.



    to be continued:
    SaulToPaul 2
    :e4e:

    Thanks, it's generally not my style. I get sucked into it occasionally, but am never proud of it when I do.
    meshak
    Yes, I understand. I should not make such a big deal out of it. It is so childish.
    Nonon
    In regards to the rep comment. Thanks for the insight concerning Jewish thoughts towards marriage.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top