YouTube censorship

[ok doser]

I realize that homosexuals are people and should and do have the same rights as everyone else.

the right to molest children and die early?

 

[Arthur Brain]

the right to molest children and die early?

Well, as you were made aware already, they don't have the right to molest children, as covered in the very act you're obviously completely unfamiliar with. Your latter is just the same usual bunk and ironically you'd be arguing in favour of censorship by denying consenting adults the right to a private sexual life.

Go figure, thought that was supposed to be a 'liberal trait'...

 

[ok doser]

Well, as you were made aware already, they don't have the right to molest children....

i guess they forgot to check with you first, because they do molest children, and at rates much higher than heterosexuals


but i guess you don't care about molested children

any more than you care about that dying early part :idunno:

 

[Arthur Brain]

i guess they forgot to check with you first, because they do molest children, and at rates much higher than heterosexuals


but i guess you don't care about molested children

any more than you care about that dying early part :idunno:

The usual trollish bunk I'd expect. There's nothing to credibly support that and nobody has the right to molest a child. As the laws have evidenced there's zero tolerance towards child molestation/abuse which I totally support. Oh, and do please spare the 'feigned' concern on behalf of gay people and their 'shorter lives'. All you're really doing is supporting the censorship of adults and breaching their human rights.

Own it dude.

 

[ok doser]

spare the 'feigned' concern on behalf of gay people and their 'shorter lives'.

i don't care about perverts who die early, same as you don't

but they take a toll on society - family, friends, lost potential

 

[Arthur Brain]

i don't care about perverts who die early, same as you don't

but they take a toll on society - family, friends, lost potential

Well of course you don't, doubt you really care about anyone much but you do seem intent on supporting measures that would censor people as well as infringing on their human rights, which again, is very ironic.

 

[ok doser]

... infringing on their human rights...

their human rights to molest children and die early

 

[Arthur Brain]

their human rights to molest children and die early

Getting kinda desperate even for you now this. They don't, once again, have any sort of right to molest children. This is all covered in the act you're completely oblivious to obviously although you can no longer claim ignorance over as you've been provided with it. For a supposed 'teacher' it's surprising you're not up to speed on the matter...

Your latter is once again the same feeble bunk. All you've effectively managed to accomplish here is an argument in favour of censorship and the breaching of human rights - as a supposed "conservative" no less.

Good job.

:chuckle:

 

[Tambora]

denying consenting adults the right to a private sexual life.

That's how it should be unless you are a heterosexual married couple.

 

[Arthur Brain]

That's how it should be unless you are a heterosexual married couple.

Then you argue for censoring people's rights as well then. Whether it's through your personal religious convictions or whatever else you're supporting censorship.

 

[ok doser]

Then you argue for censoring people's rights as well then. Whether it's through your personal religious convictions or whatever else you're supporting censorship.

same way that you support censorship of pedophiles :idunno:

 

[Tambora]

Then you argue for censoring people's rights as well then. Whether it's through your personal religious convictions or whatever else you're supporting censorship.

I support censorship of people's right to murder too. Don't you?

 

[Tambora]

same way that you support censorship of pedophiles :idunno:

And the horrid thing coming to light about widespread consensual incest. You know, because they really LOVE each other.
I'm stunned at the degradation folks will accept in the name of love.

 

[Arthur Brain]

same way that you support censorship of pedophiles :idunno:

Still not too clever on human rights under law are you?

I support censorship of people's right to murder too. Don't you?

Anything that contravenes the basic human rights of people and the law covering those very attributes I oppose. That obviously doesn't include censorship based on religion, prejudice, ignorance etc.

Pretty straightforward. Like Yorzhik & SOD, you support censorship that would infringe on people's human rights, even though this censorship thing is supposed to be a 'liberal' phenomenon...

Curious.

 

[Tambora]

Still not too clever on human rights under law are you?

Perhaps.

Anything that contravenes the basic human rights of people and the law covering those very attributes I oppose. That obviously doesn't include censorship based on religion, prejudice, ignorance etc.

Then what is it based on, and who decided?

 

[Arthur Brain]

Perhaps.

That was directed at SOD as oppose to you, although if you're not familiar with it the human rights act sets things out straightforwardly enough.

Then what is it based on, and who decided?

Common sense and several parties.

 

[Tambora]

That was directed at SOD

I know.

Common sense and several parties.

Whose common sense are you using? Sure ain't mine.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I know.



Whose common sense are you using? Sure ain't mine.

Well of course not, these laws are measured to protect the human rights of all, so you can forget about laws based on zealous religious convictions for a start. You may very well think there should be laws that deny adults the right to any sort of sexual relationship outside of marriage. The law recognizes that outside of abuse the decisions of consenting adults should be respected within or outside of wedlock.

 

[Tambora]

Well of course not, these laws are measured to protect the human rights of all, so you can forget about laws based on zealous religious convictions for a start. You may very well think there should be laws that deny adults the right to any sort of sexual relationship outside of marriage. The law recognizes that outside of abuse the decisions of consenting adults should be respected within or outside of wedlock.

I know what the law says.
Doesn't make the law right.

 

[ok doser]

That was directed at SOD ...

not sure why you think i give a crap about some perverted act :idunno: