YouTube censorship

[ok doser]

The law recognizes that outside of abuse the decisions of consenting adults should be respected within or outside of wedlock.

that's 'cause the law is written by retards

 

[Arthur Brain]

I know what the law says.
Doesn't make the law right.

Doesn't make it wrong either. Laws should certainly not be based on religious zealotry of any description and certainly not where it comes to oppressing people of their basic human rights including the right to a private life and a sexual one outside of marriage. If you would change those laws to your 'ideal' then you support censoring those rights under your belief.

 

[Arthur Brain]

that's 'cause the law is written by retards

Well, no, but by all means keep digging yourself into that censorship advocate hole you've been digging.

 

[Arthur Brain]

not sure why you think i give a crap about some perverted act :idunno:

If you were a teacher, or anyone working with people with learning disabilities or any sort of care profession in general then you've no choice but to respect it on pain of losing your job. Then again, no self respecting person in a profession like that would use the word 'retard' with abandon as you do...

 

[ok doser]

Well, no, but by all means keep digging yourself into that censorship advocate hole you've been digging.

the same hole you're in wrt pedophiles, retard :wave2:

 

[Arthur Brain]

the same hole you're in wrt pedophiles, retard :wave2:

Well, no, as pointed out before and under law, one you would have to be familiar with in order for you to be in a practice as you've claimed to be in the past. Whoops...

 

[Nick M]

Nothing new under the sun...Red77 will always side with evil.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Nothing new under the sun...Red77 will always side with evil.

But I'm not siding with you Nick, and I'm actually arguing against censorship, the likes of which conservatives on here would actively endorse.

 

[ok doser]

Nothing new under the sun...Red77 will always side with evil.

and he'll always argue in the most retarded way imaginable :chuckle:

 

[Arthur Brain]

and he'll always argue in the most retarded way imaginable :chuckle:

With a vocabulary as limited as yours it's no wonder why people like Barb & TH wind you up so much.

 

[ok doser]

With an alcohol addiction as severe as yours it's no wonder why you're retarded

 

[Arthur Brain]

With an alcohol addiction as severe as yours it's no wonder why you're retarded

:chuckle:

Oh dear, you really are at the bottom of the barrel now, having to resort to this rubbish again...

Not unexpected from you however.

 

[ok doser]

ya know, if you left and never came back, i'll bet nobody would miss you


nobody misses barbie



you should give it a try :thumb:

 

[Arthur Brain]

ya know, if you left and never came back, i'll bet nobody would miss you


nobody misses barbie



you should give it a try :thumb:

Eh, if I decide to leave at some point then I will do, won't be because some rumor spreading troll suggests it though.

 

[ok doser]

Eh, if I decide to leave at some point then I will do...

we're all looking forward to it :thumb:

 

[Arthur Brain]

we're all looking forward to it :thumb:

Hmm, don't seem to recall any sort of mourning period for when you flounced off the forums in a fit of pique for six months a while back and then resumed under yet another username...

What you look forward to or don't doesn't really interest me.



Now, back to the thread and what's now effectively conservative censorship...

 

[ok doser]

i suspect TOL will be something like this when you finally decide to go:

 

[Arthur Brain]

i suspect TOL will be something like this when you finally decide to go:

Eh, I suspect you'll have had another 23 usernames if and when that time happens.

 

[Nick M]

:mock: Red77

 

[Arthur Brain]

:mock: Red77

As much as your 'wit' ever amounted to Nick.

Now back to the subject, if you had your way would you even allow social media sites like FB to exist?