ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
How did I ever begin to take you seriously?
you're a retard? :idunno:
You should really begin your posts, "Dear Diary...drove by his thread again..."
(takes a look at the OP)
it's tam's thread
How did I ever begin to take you seriously?
You should really begin your posts, "Dear Diary...drove by his thread again..."
See? You were always like that, but I kept thinking there had to be more to you.you're a retard? :idunno:
Yeah, it wasn't about the literal. lain: See, I still give you too much credit. . . now that's funny.(takes a look at the OP)
it's tam's thread
I still give you too much credit. . .
At least I can get you to use the word reason in a response...that has to account for something. lain:for reasons already noted
Given what you lack, it's understandable. What I finally realized is that expecting more from you is my problem. I might as well be hoping my dog will one day walk in and play piano.i, on the other hand, expect nothing of you
Sod's playing the oboe with his elbows.What is going on here?
He is quite accomplished at musical challenges. Make a note of thatSod's playing the oboe with his elbows.
Well, I know he's great at blowing his own horn, but I don't think it's going to translate to the would that he could winds. :nono:He is quite accomplished at musical challenges. Make a note of that
What is going on here?
What I finally realized is that expecting more from you is my problem.
Well, you tried...on par with ok loser, but at least it shows...effort.oh, just the regularly scheduled town-clown show,
If I tried that I'd just end up hitting you in the head given your close following and likely size.in which he dislocates his arm patting himself on his back
Peanuts and car wrecks.yeah, you've been saying this for about five years
Two thoughts, to double your output over these years: first, you're still obsessing over things that relate to me from around six years ago noway and two,correction - since the first time you slunk away butthurt in october 2011
:rotfl:five and a half years
Yeppers.it's tam's thread
Yeppers.
Maybe.:thumb:
wait - if i post right after you, are you planning to whine about me following you? :noid:
It is plainly in their most sacred books. And the example they are commanded to follow.they believe in the alteration of a rule/orthodoxy that only exists demonstrably in your mind
Which can be written entirely in context:Town Heretic said:So if JoeTom wants to tell me he hates black people but he's not a racist because racists do something about it and he only has a quiet opinion, however valuable that is to him I reject it, find it intellectually bankrupt and I'm not about to agree to proceed under the pretense.
So if Muhammed wants to tell me he believes the Koran and the Hadiths but he's not a supporter of violence against infidels and apostates because jihadis do something about it and he only has a quiet opinion, however valuable that is to him I reject it, find it intellectually bankrupt and I'm not about to agree to proceed under the pretense. |
You've said that a number of times in a number of ways. The truth is that orthodox Islam doesn't agree with your reading or understanding of how to integrate and interpret their book. The cherry pickers who do agree with you are the guys everyone else is fighting, especially orthodox Islam.It is plainly in their most sacred books. And the example they are commanded to follow.
No, it can't. We aren't talking about reinventing language, we're talking about how you, with limited study and understanding one would expect from anyone outside a faith who isn't by virtue of some specialized interest and education on intimate terms with it, judge the orthodoxy and how the faith and those who are connected to it, in the main, understand it.And you said:
Which can be written entirely in context:
... we're talking about how you, with limited study and understanding one would expect from anyone outside a faith who isn't by virtue of some specialized interest and education on intimate terms with it, judge the orthodoxy and how the faith and those who are connected to it, in the main, understand it.
You've said that a number of times in a number of ways. The truth is that orthodox Islam doesn't agree with your reading or understanding of how to integrate and interpret their book. The cherry pickers who do agree with you are the guys everyone else is fighting, especially orthodox Islam.
No, it can't. We aren't talking about reinventing language, we're talking about how you, with limited study and understanding one would expect from anyone outside a faith who isn't by virtue of some specialized interest and education on intimate terms with it, judge the orthodoxy and how the faith and those who are connected to it, in the main, understand it.
This is why. Pay checks.It looks as though youtube has gone full blown to the liberal side.
This is why. Pay checks.
"Google loses more advertisers over hate videos"
http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/07/tec...eos-isis/index.html?iid=ob_homepage_tech_pool
This is why. Pay checks.
"Google loses more advertisers over hate videos"
http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/07/tec...eos-isis/index.html?iid=ob_homepage_tech_pool