I don't know, Paul Gigot pronounced it Gary.
I have no doubt that it's pronounced differently in Russian and his real name in Russian may not even be Garry. That sounds too western.
With Russian & Iranian forces now engaged in combat in Syria, people are asking,...
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
I don't know, Paul Gigot pronounced it Gary.
I have no doubt that it's pronounced differently in Russian and his real name in Russian may not even be Garry. That sounds too western.
Just remember what the Russian, Drago said to Rocky.
I don't know. What did the Russian, Drago, say to Rocky?
" I must break you " - in a real deep Soviet voice
Last edited:
We don't, Russia does. Their actions will cause it. I just heard of a sale of nuclear material thwarted by the FBI in Russia.
drbrumley
Well-known member
Please!!!!! And I say that with respect.
drbrumley
Well-known member
From my link
Russia, and not “terrorism,” is now Washington’s main target.
The evidence is clear: Putin is their main target, and has been for a while. The US and Britain have long cultivated Chechen criminal gangs who pose as “rebels”: how do you think the Tsarnaev brothers and their family entered the United States, and managed to stay under the FBI’s radar in spite of Russian warnings? Why is it that we have harbored Ilyas Akmadov, the Chechen “foreign minister,” despite protests from our own law enforcement agencies? A whole bevy of powerful figures, such as Sen. John McCain and Madeleine Albright, personally intervened in Akmadov’s case.
The reason is because, in spite of the folderol over “terrorism,” the real goals of US foreign policy have nothing to do with defeating terrorists. Indeed, we are presently using terrorists in our proxy war against Russia in Syria. Ever since the fall of the Soviet Union, the power elite have kept their eyes on the prize: global hegemony in the post-Soviet era. The “war on terrorism” was and is just a public relations ploy to keep the people in flyover country from getting too restless as we pour our diminishing resources down the interventionist rat-hole.
While some half-wit is set up by the FBI, charged with aiding and abetting “terrorism,” and jailed for the next fifty years, our policy-makers are canoodling with the scum who brought down the World Trade Center, attacked the Pentagon, and murdered 3,000 people in cold blood on American soil.
Russia, and not “terrorism,” is now Washington’s main target.
The evidence is clear: Putin is their main target, and has been for a while. The US and Britain have long cultivated Chechen criminal gangs who pose as “rebels”: how do you think the Tsarnaev brothers and their family entered the United States, and managed to stay under the FBI’s radar in spite of Russian warnings? Why is it that we have harbored Ilyas Akmadov, the Chechen “foreign minister,” despite protests from our own law enforcement agencies? A whole bevy of powerful figures, such as Sen. John McCain and Madeleine Albright, personally intervened in Akmadov’s case.
The reason is because, in spite of the folderol over “terrorism,” the real goals of US foreign policy have nothing to do with defeating terrorists. Indeed, we are presently using terrorists in our proxy war against Russia in Syria. Ever since the fall of the Soviet Union, the power elite have kept their eyes on the prize: global hegemony in the post-Soviet era. The “war on terrorism” was and is just a public relations ploy to keep the people in flyover country from getting too restless as we pour our diminishing resources down the interventionist rat-hole.
While some half-wit is set up by the FBI, charged with aiding and abetting “terrorism,” and jailed for the next fifty years, our policy-makers are canoodling with the scum who brought down the World Trade Center, attacked the Pentagon, and murdered 3,000 people in cold blood on American soil.
I certainly don't want to go back to the Cold War.
I don't want any war.
I don't control the big picture, however.
Stuff happens.
Powerful statements.
drbrumley
Well-known member
And the hits just keep on coming.....:sigh: And for some reason, you don't hear Fox reporting it, nor the other propaganda machines. Or the so called conserative candidates running for president. Wonder why?
the U.S. seems to have a double standard when it comes to organizations offering medical treatment to Islamic extremist insurgents who are enemies of America.
For a long period, Israeli military medics took in numerous insurgents from Jabhat al-Nusra (the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda) wounded from fighting to overthrow the Syrian government, patched them up, and sent them back across the border to resume fighting. The mainstream media has studiously ignored this story, but it has been amply documented and confirmed .
Israel tried to justify this by characterizing it as a purely humanitarian policy, much akin to the Doctors Without Borders policy of treating everyone in need, no questions asked.
the U.S. seems to have a double standard when it comes to organizations offering medical treatment to Islamic extremist insurgents who are enemies of America.
For a long period, Israeli military medics took in numerous insurgents from Jabhat al-Nusra (the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda) wounded from fighting to overthrow the Syrian government, patched them up, and sent them back across the border to resume fighting. The mainstream media has studiously ignored this story, but it has been amply documented and confirmed .
Israel tried to justify this by characterizing it as a purely humanitarian policy, much akin to the Doctors Without Borders policy of treating everyone in need, no questions asked.
so they fix the enemy and put them back out to fight again ? is that what you said ?
drbrumley
Well-known member
They fix our enemy, (Jabhat al-Nusra) so yes, that is what I said.
Only in the bizarro world we now find ourselves in.
Iran test-fires new generation long-range ballistic missiles
Israel makes massive discovery of oil in the Golan Heights. Is this a prelude to the “War of Gog & Magog”? Here’s the answer, Part Two.
Will the Biblical “War of Gog & Magog” bring about the end of Radical Islam as we have known it? Here’s the answer, Part Three. Mt 24:6
Israel makes massive discovery of oil in the Golan Heights. Is this a prelude to the “War of Gog & Magog”? Here’s the answer, Part Two.
Will the Biblical “War of Gog & Magog” bring about the end of Radical Islam as we have known it? Here’s the answer, Part Three. Mt 24:6
Last edited:
There's error in the claim that "God has begun to draw the Jewish people back into a spiritual relationship with Him"
(From part two)
God has always had a Remnant of saved Israelites but the nation will not be brought into a spiritually right relationship until the second coming and it will happen in one day.
(From part two)
God has always had a Remnant of saved Israelites but the nation will not be brought into a spiritually right relationship until the second coming and it will happen in one day.
Who?
To whom?
Then why do you bother?
It is only to sensationalise. You are a disgrace to the Gospel. True believers don't get excited about war.